Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36497461›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Comparison of Neurocognitive Functioning and Fine Motor Skills in Pediatric Cancer Survivors and Healthy Children.

Nadezda Chipeeva, Alena Deviaterikova, Elena Glebova, Elizaveta Romanova, Alexander Karelin, Vladimir Kasatkin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Designing oncology-specific patient-reported outcome dashboards: end-user preferences for reference curve inclusion and visualization in pediatric cancer care.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nadezda ChipeevaResearch Institute for Brain Development and Peak Performance, Peoples Friendship University of Russia, 117198 Moscow, Russia.
Alena DeviaterikovaResearch Institute for Brain Development and Peak Performance, Peoples Friendship University of Russia, 117198 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7666-1089
Elena GlebovaResearch Institute for Brain Development and Peak Performance, Peoples Friendship University of Russia, 117198 Moscow, Russia.
Elizaveta RomanovaResearch Institute for Brain Development and Peak Performance, Peoples Friendship University of Russia, 117198 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8568-0118
Alexander KarelinDmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, and Immunology, 117198 Moscow, Russia.
Vladimir KasatkinResearch Institute for Brain Development and Peak Performance, Peoples Friendship University of Russia, 117198 Moscow, Russia.
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia · RUDmitry Rogachev National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology · RU

Funding

Peoples' Friendship University of Russia 212202-2-000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The late treatment outcomes of pediatric brain tumors and of hematopoietic and lymphoid tissue tumors are an important focus of both rehabilitation and research. Neurocognitive and motor disorders induce further learning problems impeding social-emotional adaptation throughout a whole lifespan. Core deficits in short-term and working memory, visuospatial constructional ability, verbal fluency, and fine motor skills underlie distorted intellectual and academic achievement. This study aimed to assess the individual differences in cognitive ability and fine motor skills of pediatric tumor survivors and the age-matched healthy controls. Methods: A total of 504 tumor survivors after treatment and 646 age-matched healthy controls underwent neurocognitive and fine motor assessments. Findings: The group of tumor survivors scored significantly worse in both neurocognitive and fine motor skill in compared with the healthy control group. The pediatric brain tumor survivors (PBT group) performed worse in cognitive (p < 0.001 for verbal fluency and p < 0.001 for visuospatial constructional ability) and motor tests (p < 0.001) compared to the healthy controls. Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues tumors survivors (THL group) performed worse in verbal fluency (p < 0.01) and visuospatial constructional test (p < 0.001) compared to the control group. Furthermore, the PBT group had worse results in visuospatial constructional ability (p < 0.05) and fine motor (p < 0.001) ability than the THL group. Significant differences between females and males were found in fine motor test performance in the PBT group (p < 0.05), as well as in verbal fluency (p < 0.01) and visuospatial constructional ability (p < 0.01) in the control group. Neurocognitive and fine motor skill characteristics in the THL group did not correlate with age.

Indexed as

fine motor skillneurocognitive functioningpediatric brain tumortumors of hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues

Identifiers

PMID36497461
PMCPMC9738267
OpenAlexW4311282539

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.