Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36497880›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century.

Dominik Franciszek Dłuski, Monika Ruszała, Gracjan Rudziński, Kinga Pożarowska, Kinga Brzuszkiewicz, Bożena Leszczyńska-Gorzelak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Circular RNA hsa_circ_0002268 (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dominik Franciszek DłuskiChair and Department of Obstetrics and Perinatology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-954 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5886-2664
Monika RuszałaChair and Department of Obstetrics and Perinatology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-954 Lublin, Poland.
Gracjan RudzińskiFaculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland.
Kinga PożarowskaFaculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland.
Kinga BrzuszkiewiczFaculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland.
Bożena Leszczyńska-GorzelakChair and Department of Obstetrics and Perinatology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-954 Lublin, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last few decades, several definitions of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have been described. There is currently not enough research to show which way is the best to diagnose GDM. Opinions differ in terms of the optimal screening and diagnostic measures, in part due to the differences in the population risks, the cost-effectiveness considerations, and the lack of an evidence base to support large national screening programs. The basic method for identifying the disease is the measurement of glucose plasma levels which may be determined when fasting, two hours after a meal, or simply at any random time. The currently increasing incidence of diabetes in the whole population, the altering demographics and the presence of lifestyle changes still require better methods of screening for hyperglycemia, especially during pregnancy. The main aim of this review is to focus on the prevalence and modifications to the screening criteria for GDM across all continents in the 21st century. We would like to show the differences in the above issues and correlate them with the geographical situation. Looking at the history of diabetes, we are sure that more than one evolution in GDM diagnosis will occur, due to the development of medicine, appearance of modern technologies, and the dynamic continuation of research.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalHyperglycemiaBlood GlucoseFastingFemaleGlucose Tolerance TestHumansPregnancyBlood GlucosecontinentsGDM diagnosisGDM prevalencegestational diabetes mellitusoral glucose tolerance test

Identifiers

PMID36497880
PMCPMC9738915

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.