Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36498229›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Global Mapping of Interventions to Improve Quality of Life of Patients with Cancer: A Protocol for Literature Mining and Meta-Analysis.

Long Bao Nguyen, Linh Gia Vu, Xuan Thanh Nguyen, Anh Linh Do, Cuong Tat Nguyen, Laurent Boyer, Pascal Auquier, Guillaume Fond, Carl A Latkin, Roger C M Ho and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Long Bao NguyenInstitute for Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam.
Linh Gia VuInstitute for Global Health Innovations, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0003-0568-618X
Xuan Thanh NguyenHue Central General Hospital, Hue 52000, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0003-3838-6300
Anh Linh DoInstitute of Health Economics and Technology (iHEAT), Hanoi 100000, Vietnam.
Cuong Tat NguyenInstitute for Global Health Innovations, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam.
Laurent BoyerEA 3279, CEReSS, Research Centre on Health Services and Quality of Life, Aix Marseille University, 27, Boulevard Jean-Moulin, CEDEX 05, 13385 Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1229-6622
Pascal AuquierEA 3279, CEReSS, Research Centre on Health Services and Quality of Life, Aix Marseille University, 27, Boulevard Jean-Moulin, CEDEX 05, 13385 Marseille, France.
Guillaume FondEA 3279, CEReSS, Research Centre on Health Services and Quality of Life, Aix Marseille University, 27, Boulevard Jean-Moulin, CEDEX 05, 13385 Marseille, France.
Carl A LatkinBloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7931-2116
Roger C M HoDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119228, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-9629-4493
Cyrus S H HoDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119228, Singapore.

Funding

NUS Department of Psychological Medicine R-177-000-100-001/R-177-000-003-001NUS iHeathtech Other Operating Expenses R-722-000-004-731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer led to nearly 10 million deaths in 2020, as reported by the World Health Organization (WHO). Consequently, both biomedical therapeutics and psychological interventions have been implemented to decrease the burden of this non-communicable disease. However, the research conducted so far has only described some aspects of these interventions, which may increase the health-related quality of life of cancer patients. Therefore, a systematic review is necessary to depict an overall picture of the cancer interventions globally. Then, the impact of these interventions on the preference-based health-related quality of life of cancer patients may be synthesized. The protocol is developed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The Web of Science database is used to retrieve the literature using four keyword terms: quality of life (QoL), cancer, interventions, and health utility. Then, we draw the global mapping diagram and conduct the meta-analysis for this research. Additionally, longitudinal measurements are used to estimate the changes in the health utility of patients during the interventions. Thus, this systematic review can provide insight into the impact of interventions on increasing the health-related quality of life (HRQL) of cancer patients.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsQuality of LifeHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicWorld Health Organizationcancerhealth utilityHRQLinterventions

Identifiers

PMID36498229
PMCPMC9739766

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.