ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022
A Comprehensive Review of Optimal Approaches to Co-Design in Health with First Nations Australians.
Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Exploring co-design: a systematic review of concepts, processes, models, and frameworks used in public health research.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Dental Program Evaluations: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.Community dentistry and oral epidemiology · 2025Pooled it
- Lung Cancer Screening Participation Among Indigenous Peoples Worldwide: A Systematic Review of Challenges and Opportunities.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025Pooled it
- Meaningful consumer involvement in cancer care: a systematic review on co-design methods and processes.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2024Pooled it
- True Co-Design: Buzzword or Breakthrough? The Value of Authentic Relationships in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Promotion.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026Article
- Working Right Ways: Investigating Health Practitioners' Perspectives of Challenges and Barriers to Providing Good Foot Care With and for First Nations Peoples.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2026Article
- Institutional Factors Associated with Equitable Cancer Care Provision for Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Populations in Queensland, Australia: A Critical Race Theory Analysis.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Implementation of a Digital Tool to Identify Child Development and Parental Mental Health Needs Among Multicultural Communities Attending a School-Based Wellbeing Hub.Child: care, health and development · 2026Article
- Article
- Inclusiveness of social participation for health reform: findings from a realist review.International journal for equity in health · 2026Review
- Article
- "It Is All About Education, Isn't It?": Community Priorities for an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Adolescent Nutrition Program.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Co-designed principles for establishment of a virtual hospital.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Working Right Ways in Foot Health With and for First Nations Peoples: Research Method Guided and Governed by First Nations Ways of Knowing, Being, and Doing in Cross-Sectional Qualitative Study Design.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2026Article
- Child Development Interventions Among Indigenous Peoples in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States: A Scoping Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Implementing Cultural Safety in Research Methodology: The Co-Design Process of a Brief Therapeutic Intervention for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Young People Who Engage in Self-Harm and/or Suicidal Behaviours.The Australian journal of rural health · 2026Article
- Using Aboriginal participatory action research within a mixed methods study exploring COVID-19 vaccination uptake in Aboriginal women: a methodological framework for co-design.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Article
- Perspectives of Early to Mid-Career health professionals: Future public health challenges and opportunities in the Asia-Pacific region.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- The development of a Multidisciplinary e-Care Coordination (MDeCC) prototype to facilitate effective care of pressure injuries.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- A Scoping Review of Health-Related Citizen Science Projects Involving Indigenous Peoples in Australia and Internationally.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAustralia's social, structural, and political context, together with the continuing impact of colonisation, perpetuates health care and outcome disparities for First Nations Australians. A new approach led by First Nations Australians is required to address these disparities. Co-design is emerging as a valued method for First Nations Australian communities to drive change in health policy and practice to better meet their needs and priorities. However, it is critical that co-design processes and outcomes are culturally safe and effective.
methodsFirst Nations Australian co-led team conducted a comprehensive review to identify peer-reviewed and grey literature reporting the application of co-design in health-related areas by and with First Nations Australians. A First Nations Co-Design Working Group (FNCDWG) was established to guide this work and team.A Collaborative Yarning Methodology (CYM) was used to conduct a thematic analysis of the included literature.
resultsAfter full-text screening, 99 studies were included. Thematic analysis elicited the following six key themes, which included 28 practical sub-themes, relevant to co-design in health with First Nations Australians:
conclusionThe findings of this review provide a valuable snapshot of the existing evidence to be used as a starting point to guide appropriate and effective applications of co-design in health with First Nations Australians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.