Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36498299›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Survivors in Relation to Age, Type of Surgery and Length of Time since First Treatment.

Sergio Alvarez-Pardo, Ena Monserrat Romero-Pérez, Néstor Camberos-Castañeda, José Antonio de Paz, Mario Alberto Horta-Gim, Jerónimo J González-Bernal, Juan Mielgo-Ayuso, Lucía Simón-Vicente, Jessica Fernández-Solana, Josefa González-Santos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Breast MRI: Kaiser score agreement with and without diffusion].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Factors Associated with Body Image and Self-Esteem in Mastectomized Breast Cancer Survivors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  15. Related Factors with Depression and Anxiety in Mastectomized Women Breast Cancer Survivors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sergio Alvarez-PardoDepartment of Sports, Isabel I University, 09003 Burgos, Spain.
Ena Monserrat Romero-PérezDivision of Biological Sciences and Health, University of Sonora, Hermosillo 83000, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-2965-9979
Néstor Camberos-CastañedaDivision of Biological Sciences and Health, University of Sonora, Hermosillo 83000, Mexico.
José Antonio de PazInstitute of Biomedicine (IBIOMED), University of León, 24071 León, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4389-1777
Mario Alberto Horta-GimDivision of Biological Sciences and Health, University of Sonora, Hermosillo 83000, Mexico.
Jerónimo J González-BernalDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7298-9060
Juan Mielgo-AyusoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6554-4602
Lucía Simón-VicenteDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain.
Jessica Fernández-SolanaDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9937-7753
Josefa González-SantosDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain.
Universidad de Burgos · ESUniversidad de Sonora · MXUniversidad de León · ESUniversidad Isabel I · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Quality of life assessment is a critical aspect of breast cancer patient outcomes, as diagnosis, prognosis and treatment can have a major impact on quality of life. The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of the sample and to verify the relationship between quality of life (QOL) in women diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) and their age, type or surgery and time since treatment; (2) Methods: a cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted with 183 women diagnosed with BC, aged 30−80 years in Mexico. Women’s QOL was assessed using two questionnaires, The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and The Breast Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-BR23). (3) Results: the results show significant differences in several items when the variable age is taken into account, indicating that younger women have poorer social and sexual function, as well as poorer sexual enjoyment and lower expectations of the future. The type of surgery also indicates a significantly better QOL in those women who receive conservative treatment versus a mastectomy; the time elapsed since surgery does not show any significant results, except for sexual functioning and breast-related symptoms where >5 years implies better scores on the items. (4) Conclusions: in conclusion, it is important to take into account the characteristics of women with BC, particularly at the time of treatment, in order to mitigate the impact of the disease on their QOL with the help of a multidisciplinary team.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMastectomyQuality of LifeSurveys and Questionnairesagebreast cancerbreast-conserving therapymastectomyquality of life

Identifiers

PMID36498299
PMCPMC9741017
OpenAlexW4311519317

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.