Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36498468›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

The Effect of Upadacitinib on Lipid Profile and Cardiovascular Events: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Anastasios Makris, Fotios Barkas, Petros P Sfikakis, Evangelos Liberopoulos, Aris P Agouridis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Efficacy of upadacitinib in palmoplantar pustulosis case series highlights the complex immune response patterns.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib in refractory pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: A single-arm meta-analysis of observational studies.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anastasios MakrisSchool of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0001-9246-8249
Fotios BarkasDepartment of Hygiene & Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-5940-6895
Petros P SfikakisFirst Department of Propaedeutic Medicine, Medical School, Laiko General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.
Evangelos LiberopoulosFirst Department of Propaedeutic Medicine, Medical School, Laiko General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7162-3323
Aris P AgouridisSchool of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0002-9749-5075

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur aim was to systematically investigate the effect of upadacitinib, an oral JAK-1 selective inhibitor, on lipid profile and cardiovascular disease risk.

methodsPubMed, PubMed Central and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to 31 July 2022. We performed a qualitative synthesis of published RCTs to investigate the associations of upadacitinib with lipoprotein changes, along with a quantitative synthesis of MACE and mean lipoprotein changes where there were available data.

resultsNineteen RCTs were eligible for the present systematic review, which included 10,656 patients with a mean age of 51 years and a follow-up period of 12-52 weeks. Increases in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) were noted upon upadacitinib administration (3-48 mg/day) in 15 studies, while the LDL-C:HDL-C ratio remained unchanged. The pooled analyses of three placebo-controlled RCTs (

conclusionsTreatment with upadacitinib increases both LDL-C and HDL-C levels. Nevertheless, upadacitinib had no significant effect on the cardiovascular disease risk during a ≤52-week follow-up.

Indexed as

ABT-494cardiovascular diseasecholesterolJanus kinase inhibitorslipidsupadacitinib

Identifiers

PMID36498468
PMCPMC9740350

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.