ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022
Prognostic Value of Histological and Immunohistochemical Data in Diabetic Foot Ulcers.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validation and Clinimetric Properties of the Persian Version of the Leg Ulcer Measurement Tool.International wound journal · 2026Article
- A comprehensive review on diabetic foot ulcer addressing vascular insufficiency, impaired immune response, and delayed wound healing mechanisms.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Advanced multifunctional hydrogels for diabetic foot ulcer healing: Active substances and biological functions.Journal of diabetes · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic foot ulcers are an extremely urgent medical and social problem throughout the world. The purpose of this study was to analyse the histological and immunohistochemical features of tissues and cells of different sections of wounds taken during the primary surgical treatment of chronic wounds in patients with diabetic foot syndrome with favourable and unfavourable outcomes. MATERIAL AND
methodsA clinical prospective observational study of the treatment outcomes of fifty-three patients with diabetic foot ulcers hospitalized twice in one specialized centre over the course of the year was conducted. The analysis of histological and immunohistochemical data of the tissues of the edges and the centre of the ulcer taken during the primary surgical treatment was performed. While performing histological analyses of wound tissues, special attention was given to the determination of cellular characteristics of leukocyte-necrotic masses, granulation tissue, and loose and dense connective tissue. Immunohistochemistry was performed using a set of monoclonal antibodies, allowing verification of neutrophilic leukocytes, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells.
resultsUnfavourable outcomes (amputation, reamputation, death from cardiovascular diseases, nonhealing ulcer within a year) were registered in 52.8% of cases. Uniform distribution of neutrophils and endothelial cell fibroblasts in all parts of the wound was recorded in patients with a favourable outcome. An unfavourable outcome was predetermined by the uneven content of these cells with a significant increase in neutrophilic leukocytosis in the bottom of the wounds, as well as a significant decrease in the number of fibroblasts and endotheliocytes in the centre of the wounds.
conclusionsThe datasets obtained during primary surgical treatment are extremely informative to predict the outcome of the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers and indicate more active surgical strategies with the potential to reduce the treatment time, increase its effectiveness, and eventually make the treatment cost-effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.