Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36499106›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Exploring GPR109A Receptor Interaction with Hippuric Acid Using MD Simulations and CD Spectroscopy.

Dipendra Bhandari, Sangita Kachhap, Geet Madhukar, Kiran Kumar Adepu, Andriy Anishkin, Jin-Ran Chen, Sree V Chintapalli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Dipendra BhandariArkansas Children's Nutrition Center, Little Rock, AR 72202, USA.
Sangita KachhapJerzy Haber Institute of Catalysis and Surface Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, 30-239 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2009-1782
Geet MadhukarDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72202, USA.
Kiran Kumar AdepuDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72202, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6612-1823
Andriy AnishkinDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Jin-Ran ChenDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72202, USA.
Sree V ChintapalliDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72202, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8457-9643
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USArkansas Children's Nutrition Center · USJerzy Haber Institute of Catalysis and Surface Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences · PLUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

USDA-Agricultural Research Service Project 6026-51000-012-06S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research has indicated that various metabolites belonging to phenolic acids (PAs), produced by gut microflora through the breakdown of polyphenols, help in promoting bone development and protecting bone from degeneration. Results have also suggested that G-protein-coupled receptor 109A (GPR109A) functions as a receptor for those specific PAs such as hippuric acid (HA) and 3-(3-hydroxyphenyl) propionic acid (3-3-PPA). Indeed, HA has a molecular structural similarity with nicotinic acid (niacin) which has been shown previously to bind to GPR109A receptor and to mediate antilipolytic effects; however, the binding pocket and the structural nature of the interaction remain to be recognized. In the present study, we employed a computational strategy to elucidate the molecular structural determinants of HA binding to GPR109A and GPR109B homology models in understanding the regulation of osteoclastogenesis. Based on the docking and molecular dynamics simulation studies, HA binds to GPR109A similarly to niacin. Specifically, the transmembrane helices 3, 4 and 6 (TMH3, TMH4 and TMH6) and Extracellular loop 1 and 2 (ECL1 and ECL2) residues of GRP109A; R111 (TMH3), K166 (TMH4), ECL2 residues; S178 and S179, and R251 (TMH6), and residues of GPR109B; Y87, Y86, S91 (ECL1) and C177 (ECL2) contribute for HA binding. Simulations and Molecular Mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann solvent accessible area (MM-PBSA) calculations reveal that HA has higher affinity for GPR109A than for GPR109B. Additionally, in silico mutation analysis of key residues have disrupted the binding and HA exited out from the GPR109A protein. Furthermore, measurements of time-resolved circular dichroism spectra revealed that there are no major conformational changes in the protein secondary structure on HA binding. Taken together, our findings suggest a mechanism of interaction of HA with both GPR109A and GPR109B receptors.

Indexed as

NiacinReceptors, NicotinicHippuratesReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSpectrum AnalysisHippurateshippuric acidNiacinReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledReceptors, NicotinicacifranAutoDockhippuric acidligand bindingmolecular dynamics simulationsnicotinic acid (niacin)

Identifiers

PMID36499106
PMCPMC9741133
OpenAlexW4310244095

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.