Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36499362›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Synthetic, Cell-Derived, Brain-Derived, and Recombinant β-Amyloid: Modelling Alzheimer's Disease for Research and Drug Development.

Kseniya B Varshavskaya, Vladimir A Mitkevich, Alexander A Makarov, Evgeny P Barykin

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. PET imaging of alpha-synuclein: from radiotracer design through in vitro and in vivo translation.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. NMDARs in Alzheimer's Disease: Between Synaptic and Extrasynaptic Membranes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The intracerebral injection of AβFrontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kseniya B VarshavskayaEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Vavilov St. 32, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Vladimir A MitkevichEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Vavilov St. 32, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1517-1983
Alexander A MakarovEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Vavilov St. 32, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Evgeny P BarykinEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Vavilov St. 32, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology · RU

Funding

The Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation Agreement No. 075-15-2022-264
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia in the elderly, characterised by the accumulation of senile plaques and tau tangles, neurodegeneration, and neuroinflammation in the brain. The development of AD is a pathological cascade starting according to the amyloid hypothesis with the accumulation and aggregation of the β-amyloid peptide (Aβ), which induces hyperphosphorylation of tau and promotes the pro-inflammatory activation of microglia leading to synaptic loss and, ultimately, neuronal death. Modelling AD-related processes is important for both studying the molecular basis of the disease and the development of novel therapeutics. The replication of these processes is often achieved with the use of a purified Aβ peptide. However, Aβ preparations obtained from different sources can have strikingly different properties. This review aims to compare the structure and biological effects of Aβ oligomers and aggregates of a higher order: synthetic, recombinant, purified from cell culture, or extracted from brain tissue. The authors summarise the applicability of Aβ preparations for modelling Aβ aggregation, neurotoxicity, cytoskeleton damage, receptor toxicity in vitro and cerebral amyloidosis, synaptic plasticity disruption, and cognitive impairment in vivo and ex vivo. Further, the paper discusses the causes of the reported differences in the effect of Aβ obtained from the sources mentioned above. This review points to the importance of the source of Aβ for AD modelling and could help researchers to choose the optimal way to model the Aβ-induced abnormalities.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesAgedBrainDrug DevelopmentHumansPlaque, AmyloidAmyloid beta-PeptidesAlzheimer’s diseaseamyloid fibrilsamyloidogenesisbeta-amyloid peptideLTPNMDARpost-translational modificationtautoxic oligomers

Identifiers

PMID36499362
PMCPMC9738609
OpenAlexW4310382836

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.