Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36503413›Full record

Trial reportEmerging microbes & infections2023

Antibody persistence and safety after heterologous boosting with orally aerosolised Ad5-nCoV in individuals primed with two-dose CoronaVac previously: 12-month analyses of a randomized controlled trial.

Lairun Jin, Rong Tang, Shipo Wu, Xiling Guo, Haitao Huang, Lihua Hou, Xiaoqin Chen, Tao Zhu, Jinbo Gou, Jin Zhong and 13 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Emerging microbes & infections, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Insights for COVID-19 in 2023.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Lairun JinSchool of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Rong TangNational Health Commission (NHC) Key Laboratory of Enteric Pathogenic Microbiology (Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention), Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Shipo WuBeijing Institute of Biotechnology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xiling GuoNational Health Commission (NHC) Key Laboratory of Enteric Pathogenic Microbiology (Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention), Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Haitao HuangCansino Biologics Inc., Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Lihua HouBeijing Institute of Biotechnology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoqin ChenDonghai County Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Tao ZhuCansino Biologics Inc., Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Jinbo GouCansino Biologics Inc., Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Jin ZhongDonghai County Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Hongxing PanNational Health Commission (NHC) Key Laboratory of Enteric Pathogenic Microbiology (Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention), Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Lunbiao CuiNational Health Commission (NHC) Key Laboratory of Enteric Pathogenic Microbiology (Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention), Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Yin ChenNational Health Commission (NHC) Key Laboratory of Enteric Pathogenic Microbiology (Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention), Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Xin XiaSchool of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Jialu FengSchool of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Xue WangCansino Biologics Inc., Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Qi ZhaoCansino Biologics Inc., Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
XiaoYu XuVazyme Biotech Co., Ltd, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Zhuopei LiSchool of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoyin ZhangSchool of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Wei ChenBeijing Institute of Biotechnology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jingxin LiNational Health Commission (NHC) Key Laboratory of Enteric Pathogenic Microbiology (Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention), Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Fengcai ZhuSchool of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-1644-0006

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibody persistence and safety up to 12 months of heterologous orally administered adenovirus type-5 vector-based COVID-19 vaccine (Ad5-nCoV) in individuals who were primed with two-dose inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) previously, has not been reported yet. This randomized, open-label, single-centre trial included Chinese adults who have received two-dose CoronaVac randomized to low-dose or high-dose aerosolised Ad5-nCoV group, or CoronaVac group. In this report, we mainly evaluated the geometric mean titres (GMTs) of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against live wild-type SARS-CoV-2 virus and omicron BA.4/5 pseudovirus at 12 months after the booster dose and the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) till month 12. Of 419 participants, all were included in the safety analysis and 120 (28.64%) were included in the immunogenicity analysis. Serum NAb GMT against live wild-type SARS-CoV-2 was 204.36 (95% CI 152.91, 273.14) in the low-dose group and 171.38 (95% CI 121.27, 242.19) in the high-dose group at month 12, significantly higher than the GMT in the CoronaVac group (8.00 [95% CI 4.22, 15.17],

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdultAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralHumansSARS-CoV-2Vaccines, InactivatedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 Vaccinessinovac COVID-19 vaccineVaccines, Inactivatedbooster doseCOVID-19 vaccinesheterologouslong-term immunityorally administration

Identifiers

PMID36503413
PMCPMC10519268

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.