Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36504944›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2022

What do we know about the effect of night-shift work on cardiovascular risk factors? An umbrella review.

Stephanie Boini, Eve Bourgkard, Jean Ferrières, Yolande Esquirol

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephanie BoiniDepartment of Occupational Epidemiology, French Research and Safety Institute for the Prevention of Occupational Accidents and Diseases (INRS), Vandœuvre-les-Nancy, France.
Eve BourgkardDepartment of Occupational Epidemiology, French Research and Safety Institute for the Prevention of Occupational Accidents and Diseases (INRS), Vandœuvre-les-Nancy, France.
Jean FerrièresUMR1295, Paul Sabatier III University - INSERM CERPOP: Centre for Epidemiology and Research in POPulation Health, Toulouse, France.
Yolande EsquirolUMR1295, Paul Sabatier III University - INSERM CERPOP: Centre for Epidemiology and Research in POPulation Health, Toulouse, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the existing evidence on the effect of night-shift work and its subtypes (permanent and rotating) on cardiovascular risk factors: diabetes, lipid disorders, being overweight, hypertension, smoking habits, sedentariness, and occupational psychosocial stressors. Method: A Web of Sciences and Cochrane review library search was conducted to identify systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis dealing with the quantification of the link between night-shift work and the studied cardiovascular risk factors in working populations. We used the AMSTAR 2 to evaluate the quality of each review. The main results of the included systematic reviews were compiled in a summary structured around the different cardiovascular risk factors. Results: After selection, 33 systematic reviews were included: nine for diabetes, four for lipid disorders, nine for being overweight, four for hypertension, two for smoking habits, three for occupational psychosocial stressors and two for sedentariness. The results confirmed an excess risk of diabetes of about 10% regardless of the type of night work. A stated excess risk of being overweight at around 25% was also highlighted for shift workers overall, which could reach 38% among night-shift workers. An increased risk of obesity, estimated at 5% for night-shift workers and at 18% for rotating shift workers, was observed. An excess risk of hypertension was estimated at around 30% when considering the broad definition of shift work and when night periods were included in rotating shifts. The literature provided inconsistent results for the link between lipid disorders and night-shift work. Shift workers appeared to be more likely to smoke. The link between shift work and occupational psychosocial stressors was scarcely explored in the available studies. Sedentariness was scarcely considered in systematic reviews, which prevents any firm conclusions. Conclusion: The consequences of night work in terms of diabetes, being overweight/obesity and hypertension are established. Monitoring of these cardiovascular risk factors for these night-shift workers could be implemented by practitioners. In contrast, the links with lipid disorders, sedentariness, smoking habits, and occupational psychosocial stressors warrant further investigation. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021275212, PROSPERO (ID CRD42021275212).

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesHypertensionShift Work ScheduleHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansLipidsObesityOverweightRisk FactorsSystematic Reviews as TopicLipidsdiabetes and hypertensionlipid disordersnight-shift workoverweightpsychosocial stressors at worksedentarinessshift worksmoking

Identifiers

PMID36504944
PMCPMC9727235

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.