Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36507352›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

User-centered design and development of TWIN-Acta: A novel control suite of the TWIN lower limb exoskeleton for the rehabilitation of persons post-stroke.

Marianna Semprini, Tiziana Lencioni, Wiebke Hinterlang, Christian Vassallo, Silvia Scarpetta, Stefano Maludrottu, Riccardo Iandolo, Marta Carè, Matteo Laffranchi, Michela Chiappalone and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Brain-Computer Interfaces for Stroke Motor Rehabilitation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marianna SempriniRehab Technologies Lab, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Tiziana LencioniDepartment of Informatics, Bioengineering, Robotics, and Systems Engineering (DIBRIS), Universitá degli Studi di Genova, Genoa, Italy.
Wiebke HinterlangRehab Technologies Lab, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Christian VassalloRehab Technologies Lab, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Silvia ScarpettaRehab Technologies Lab, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Stefano MaludrottuRehab Technologies Lab, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Riccardo IandoloRehab Technologies Lab, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Marta CarèRehab Technologies Lab, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Matteo LaffranchiRehab Technologies Lab, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Michela ChiappaloneRehab Technologies Lab, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Maurizio FerrarinIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy.
Lorenzo De MichieliRehab Technologies Lab, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy.
Johanna JonsdottirIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy.
Italian Institute of Technology · ITDon Carlo Gnocchi Foundation · ITUniversity of Genoa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Difficulties faced while walking are common symptoms after stroke, significantly reducing the quality of life. Walking recovery is therefore one of the main priorities of rehabilitation. Wearable powered exoskeletons have been developed to provide lower limb assistance and enable training for persons with gait impairments by using typical physiological movement patterns. Exoskeletons were originally designed for individuals without any walking capacities, such as subjects with complete spinal cord injuries. Recent systematic reviews suggested that lower limb exoskeletons could be valid tools to restore independent walking in subjects with residual motor function, such as persons post-stroke. To ensure that devices meet end-user needs, it is important to understand and incorporate their perspectives. However, only a limited number of studies have followed such an approach in the post-stroke population. Methods: The aim of the study was to identify the end-users needs and to develop a user-centered-based control system for the TWIN lower limb exoskeleton to provide post-stroke rehabilitation. We thus describe the development and validation, by clinical experts, of TWIN-Acta: a novel control suite for TWIN, specifically designed for persons post-stroke. We detailed the conceived control strategy and developmental phases, and reported evaluation sessions performed on healthy clinical experts and people post-stroke to evaluate TWIN-Acta usability, acceptability, and barriers to usage. At each developmental stage, the clinical experts received a one-day training on the TWIN exoskeleton equipped with the TWIN-Acta control suite. Data on usability, acceptability, and limitations to system usage were collected through questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Results: The system received overall good usability and acceptability ratings and resulted in a well-conceived and safe approach. All experts gave excellent ratings regarding the possibility of modulating the assistance provided by the exoskeleton during the movement execution and concluded that the TWIN-Acta would be useful in gait rehabilitation for persons post-stroke. The main limit was the low level of system learnability, attributable to the short-time of usage. This issue can be minimized with prolonged training and must be taken into consideration when planning rehabilitation. Discussion: This study showed the potential of the novel control suite TWIN-Acta for gait rehabilitation and efficacy studies are the next step in its evaluation process.

Indexed as

balancegaitlower limb exoskeletonneurorehabilitationrehabilitationstroke

Identifiers

PMID36507352
PMCPMC9729698
OpenAlexW4309844121

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.