ArticleScientific reports2022
Predicting multipotency of human adult stem cells derived from various donors through deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- From pixels to patterns: the AI revolution in stem cell-derived models.Nature methods · 2026Review
- BrAIn: A comprehensive artificial intelligence-based morphology analysis system for brain organoids and neuroscience.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Article
- Chondrogenic Differentiation of Stem Cells for Cartilage Regeneration: Advances and Future Perspectives.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2026Review
- Machine Learning in Stem Cell Research: From Biological Data to Clinical Translation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Driven Innovation: Advancing Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapies and Intelligent Biomaterials for Regenerative Medicine.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Addressing the challenges of immunogenicity, heterogeneity and tumorigenicity in the clinical translation of human embryonic stem cells.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Flu-CNN: identifying host specificity of Influenza A virus using convolutional networks.Human genomics · 2025Article
- Efficient Differentiation of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell (hiPSC)-Derived Mesenchymal Progenitors Into Adipocytes and Osteoblasts.Bio-protocol · 2023Article
- Human Stem Cells for Ophthalmology: Recent Advances in Diagnostic Image Analysis and Computational Modelling.Current stem cell reports · 2023Review
- Morphology-based deep learning approach for predicting adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs).Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Article
- Deep learning models for cancer stem cell detection: a brief review.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adult stem cell-based therapeutic approaches have great potential in regenerative medicine because of their immunoregulatory properties and multidifferentiation capacity. Nevertheless, the outcomes of stem cell‑based therapies to date have shown inconsistent efficacy owing to donor variation, thwarting the expectation of clinical effects. However, such donor dependency has been elucidated by biological consequences that current research could not predict. Here, we introduce cellular morphology-based prediction to determine the multipotency rate of human nasal turbinate stem cells (hNTSCs), aiming to predict the differentiation rate of keratocyte progenitors. We characterized the overall genes and morphologies of hNTSCs from five donors and compared stemness-related properties, including multipotency and specific lineages, using mRNA sequencing. It was demonstrated that transformation factors affecting the principal components were highly related to cell morphology. We then performed a convolutional neural network-based analysis, which enabled us to assess the multipotency level of each cell group based on their morphologies with 85.98% accuracy. Surprisingly, the trend in expression levels after ex vivo differentiation matched well with the deep learning prediction. These results suggest that AI‑assisted cellular behavioral prediction can be utilized to perform quantitative, non-invasive, single-cell, and multimarker characterizations of live stem cells for improved quality control in clinical cell therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.