Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36519410›Full record

SynthesisInternational wound journal2023

Clinical outcomes of negative pressure wound therapy with instillation vs standard negative pressure wound therapy for wounds: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Guoqi Wang, Haiyan Xu, Gaoxiang Xu, Hao Zhang, Zhirui Li, Daohong Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International wound journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Modulates Wound pH and Bacterial Invasion inPlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Guoqi WangDepartment of Pediatric, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Haiyan XuDepartment of Pharmacy, Medical Supplies Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Gaoxiang XuDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hao ZhangNational Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation, Beijing, China.
Zhirui LiDepartment of Orthopedics, Hainan Hospital of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Sanya, China.
Daohong LiuNational Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation, Beijing, China.
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) with or without instillation has been extensively applied for patients with multiple wound types. Whether NPWT with instillation is superior to NPWT alone is not known. This study aims to compare the efficacy between negative pressure wound therapy with instillation (NPWTi) and standard negative pressure wound therapy for wounds. The authors searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials investigating clinical outcomes of negative pressure wound therapy with instillation vs standard negative pressure wound therapy for wounds. The registration number (protocol) on PROSPERO is CRD42022287178. Eight RCTs involved 564 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included finally. NPWTi showed a significant fewer surgeries and dressing changes (RR and 95% CI, -9.31 [-17.54, -1.08], P < 0.05), and smaller wound area after treatment (RR and 95% CI, -9.31 [-17.54, -1.08], P < 0.05) compared with NPWT. No significant difference was observed on healing rate, time to heal, length of stay, dehiscence, reinfection, reoperation and readmission between NPWTi and NPWT. The addition of instillation to NPWT could improve clinical outcomes regarding the number of surgeries and dressing changes, and wound area after treatment in patients with multiple wound types. However, because of the heterogeneity these conclusions still need to be further validated by more well-designed RCTs with large sample sizes.

Indexed as

Multiple TraumaNegative-Pressure Wound TherapyHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReoperationSurgical Wound InfectionWound Healinginstillationnegative pressure therapywoundwound clinical outcome

Identifiers

PMID36519410
PMCPMC10088847
OpenAlexW4311583446

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.