ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2023
MinION Sequencing of Yeast Mock Communities To Assess the Effect of Databases and ITS-LSU Markers on the Reliability of Metabarcoding Analysis.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative evaluation of microbiome sequencing resolution under varying experimental conditions using defined mock communities.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Linking geographic flavor signatures to microbial origin in high-temperature Daqu: An integrated metaproteomics and metabolomics approach.Food chemistry: X · 2026Article
- Protein Coding Low-CopyEcology and evolution · 2025Article
- The bacterial and yeast microbiota in livestock forages in Hungary.BMC microbiology · 2024Article
- Primed and ready: nanopore metabarcoding can now recover highly accurate consensus barcodes that are generally indel-free.BMC genomics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbial communities play key roles both for humans and the environment. They are involved in ecosystem functions, maintaining their stability, and provide important services, such as carbon cycle and nitrogen cycle. Acting both as symbionts and as pathogens, description of the structure and composition of these communities is important. Metabarcoding uses ribosomal DNA (rDNA) (eukaryotic) or rRNA gene (prokaryotic) sequences for identification of species present in a site and measuring their abundance. This procedure requires several technical steps that could be source of bias producing a distorted view of the real community composition. In this work, we took advantage of an innovative "long-read" next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology (MinION) amplifying the DNA spanning from the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) to large subunit (LSU) that can be read simultaneously in this platform, providing more information than "short-read" systems. The experimental system consisted of six fungal mock communities composed of species present at various relative amounts to mimic natural situations characterized by predominant and low-frequency species. The influence of the sequencing platform (MinION and Illumina MiSeq) and the effect of different reference databases and marker sequences on metagenomic identification of species were evaluated. The results showed that the ITS-based database provided more accurate species identification than LSU. Furthermore, a procedure based on a preliminary identification with standard reference databases followed by the production of custom databases, including only the best outputs of the first step, is proposed. This additional step improved the estimate of species proportion of the mock communities and reduced the number of ghost species not really present in the simulated communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.