ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)2022
Models of depressive pseudoamnestic disorder.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- What do we know about pseudodementia?General psychiatry · 2023Review
- Models of depressive pseudoamnestic disorder.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.) · 2022Article
- The functional role of the pulvinar in discriminating between objective and subjective cognitive impairment in major depressive disorder.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Little effort has been made in the past to validate depressive pseudodementia based on hypothesis-driven approaches. We extended this concept to individuals with amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Major Depression, that is, pseudodepressive amnestic disorder. We tested two hypotheses consistent with the presentations and mechanisms associated with this potential syndrome: improvements in cognition would be significantly correlated with improvements in depression after treatment (Hypothesis 1), and if not confirmed, the presence of such an association could be identified once moderator variables were taken into account (Hypothesis 2). Methods: Within a clinical trial, 61 individuals received open label serotonin reuptake inhibitor (citalopram or venlafaxine) treatment over a 16-week period. Selective Reminding Test and Hamilton Depression scale were conducted serially to measure change in memory and depression, respectively. Magnetic resonance imaging, other cognitive measures (Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive and speed of processing tests), and additional depression measure (Beck Depression Inventory [BDI]) were also administered. Results: No significant associations between improvement in depression and improvement in cognition were observed. Sensitivity analyses with other cognitive measures, the BDI, and exclusion of possible "placebo" responders were negative as well. There were no significant moderation effects for baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression as a measure of symptom severity or age. Conclusions: Negative findings cast doubt on the frequency of depressive pseudoamnestic disorder in older populations with documented depression and memory impairments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.