Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36529986›Full record

SynthesisSports health

Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training on Exercise Capacity, Blood Pressure, and Autonomic Responses in Patients With Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Fabricio Olinda de Souza Mesquita, Bruno Bavaresco Gambassi, Marcio de Oliveira Silva, Sérgio Rodrigues Moreira, Victor Ribeiro Neves, Mansueto Gomes-Neto, Paulo Adriano Schwingel

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Fabricio Olinda de Souza MesquitaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde (PPGCS), Universidade de Pernambuco (UPE), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Bruno Bavaresco GambassiLaboratório de Pesquisas em Desempenho Humano (LAPEDH), UPE, Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3852-0602
Marcio de Oliveira SilvaLaboratório de Pesquisas em Desempenho Humano (LAPEDH), UPE, Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Sérgio Rodrigues MoreiraLaboratório de Pesquisas em Desempenho Humano (LAPEDH), UPE, Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Victor Ribeiro NevesLaboratório de Pesquisas em Desempenho Humano (LAPEDH), UPE, Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Mansueto Gomes-NetoLaboratório de Pesquisas em Desempenho Humano (LAPEDH), UPE, Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0717-9694
Paulo Adriano SchwingelPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde (PPGCS), Universidade de Pernambuco (UPE), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2935-3403
Secretaria de Educação de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Federal da Bahia · BRUniversidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextDespite the well-known positive effects of exercise in hypertensive patients, the best mode of exercise is still under discussion.

objectiveA systematic review of the literature, synthesizing data on the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on peak oxygen consumption (VO DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (via PubMed), CENTRAL, PEDro database, and SciELO (from the earliest date available to December 31, 2020). STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effects of HIIT in hypertensive patients. STUDY

designSystematic review and meta-analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2. DATA EXTRACTION: Mean differences (MDs) with a 95% CI were calculated, and heterogeneity was assessed using the

resultsNine RCTs encompassing 569 patients met the eligibility criteria and were included in the systematic review. Five trials compared supervised HIIT with moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) and a control; 1 trial compared HIIT with MICT, and 3 compared HIIT with a control. In comparison with MICT, HIIT improved VO

conclusionDespite the low quality of the evidence, HIIT is superior to MICT in improving VO

Indexed as

High-Intensity Interval TrainingHypertensionBlood PressureExerciseExercise ToleranceHumansblood pressureexercisehypertensionrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID36529986
PMCPMC10293559
OpenAlexW4311928301

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.