Evidence mapPaperPMID 36531482Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2022

A systematic review of lived experiences of people with polycystic ovary syndrome highlights the need for holistic care and co-creation of educational resources.

Gar Mun Lau, Mirna Elghobashy, Mansi Thanki, Shirley Ibegbulam, Pallavi Latthe, Caroline D T Gillett, Michael W O'Reilly, Wiebke Arlt, Antje Lindenmeyer, Punith Kempegowda and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gar Mun LauCollege of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Mirna ElghobashyCollege of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Mansi ThankiSchool of Pharmacy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Shirley IbegbulamSchool of Pharmacy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Pallavi LattheBirmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham Women's and Children's National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, , Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Caroline D T GillettInstitute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Michael W O'ReillyRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI) University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Wiebke ArltInstitute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Antje LindenmeyerInstitute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Punith KempegowdaInstitute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
PCOS SEva Working Group
University of Birmingham · GBRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IEUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health BRC-1215-20009Wellcome Trust WT209492/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: PCOS-related literature is mostly dominated by the medical perspective. However, the condition's lifelong, far reaching, and multifaceted impacts highlight the importance to gain the perspectives from those with PCOS. Therefore, we performed a systematic review to explore the current literatures and gaps around the experiences and perceptions of those living with PCOS. Method: A comprehensive search of seven electronic databases was conducted between July and October 2021. A total 34 from 1615 screened articles were included in this systematic review and subsequently coded using NVivo 12 software. The quality of individual studies was assessed by adaptation to the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) quality assessment tool. Results: Five domains were generated from the data: Signs/Symptoms, Diagnosis, Management, Perceptions, Resources and Improving Outcomes. Dissatisfaction surrounding the experience of diagnosis was common. Concerns surrounded perceived lack of knowledge from healthcare professionals and delays in diagnosis. Individual studies on adults and adolescents shared similar feelings. The consensus was found to be that current management was vague and generalised. Symptoms such as hirsutism, obesity, irregular menstruation challenge personal and societal expectations of femininity. Online PCOS resources are popular amongst those with PCOS but most of them lack evidence. A call for more culturally specific resources was found to be common ground amongst those with PCOS. Conclusion: Overall dissatisfaction amongst adults and adolescents regarding their diagnostic journey of PCOS. Tailored and culturally specific PCOS advice and management is necessary and can be achieved through co-creation of resources between healthcare professionals and those with PCOS. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42021272371.

Indexed as

Polycystic Ovary SyndromeAdolescentAdultBehavior TherapyFemaleHirsutismHumansMenstruation Disturbancesculturally appropriate resourcesexpectationslived experiencePCOSperspectivespolycystic ovary syndromesatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID36531482
PMCPMC9755159
OpenAlexW4311195206

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.