Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36531894›Full record

ArticleKidney international reports2022

Understanding International Variations in Kidney Failure Incidence and Initiation of Replacement Therapy.

Natalia Alencar de Pinho, Lisa Henn, Rupesh Raina, Helmut Reichel, Antonio A Lopes, Christian Combe, Elodie Speyer, Brian Bieber, Bruce M Robinson, Bénédicte Stengel and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Natalia Alencar de PinhoCenter for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris-Saclay University, Paris-Sud University, Versailles Saint Quentin University, INSERM, Villejuif, France.
Lisa HennArbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Rupesh RainaCleveland Clinic Akron General Medical Center, Akron, Ohio, USA.
Helmut ReichelNephrological Center, Villingen Schwenningen, Germany.
Antonio A LopesDepartment of Internal Medicine, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
Christian CombeService de Néphrologie Transplantation Dialyse Aphérèse, CHU de Bordeaux, Univ. Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Elodie SpeyerCenter for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris-Saclay University, Paris-Sud University, Versailles Saint Quentin University, INSERM, Villejuif, France.
Brian BieberArbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Bruce M RobinsonArbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Bénédicte StengelCenter for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Paris-Saclay University, Paris-Sud University, Versailles Saint Quentin University, INSERM, Villejuif, France.
Roberto Pecoits-FilhoArbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
CKDopps investigators
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health · USAkron General Medical Center · USCentre de recherche en Epidémiologie et Santé des Populations · FRNephrologisches Zentrum Villingen-Schwenningen · DEUniversidade Federal da Bahia · BRUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversité Paris-Saclay · FRUniversité Paris-Sud · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Incidence of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) varies widely across countries. Its relations to individual characteristics, nephrology practices for slowing chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression, and KRT access remain unclear. Methods: We investigated intercountry differences in kidney failure (KF) rate, defined by a sustained estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <15 ml/min per 1.73 m Results: Among 7381 patients with CKD stage 3 to 4 at enrollment, 1297 progressed to KF and 947 initiated KRT over a 3-year follow-up period. Compared to the United States, demographic-adjusted and eGFR-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) (HRs, 95% confidence intervals [CI]) for a sustained low eGFR were 0.77 (95% CI, 0.57-1.02) in Brazil, 0.90 (95% CI, 0.75-1.08) in France, and 1.03 (95% CI, 0.86-1.03) in Germany. Further adjustment for comorbidities, albuminuria, systolic BP, and RAASi prescription did not substantially change these HRs. In contrast, compared with the United States, the fully-adjusted HR for KRT remained significantly lower in Brazil (0.55, 95% CI 0.39-0.79), higher in Germany (95% CI, 1.36, 1.09-1.69), and similar in France (95% CI, 1.07, 0.81-1.39). Conclusion: Individual risk factors for CKD progression in nephrology patients appeared to explain most intercountry variations in KF but not KRT incidence. This suggests a prominent role for differences in practices related to KRT initiation or access, but not those for slowing disease progression. This study also shows that using KRT as a KF surrogate may bias estimates of associations with CKD progression risk factors.

Indexed as

chronic kidney diseaseepidemiologyinternational comparisonskidney failurekidney replacement therapyrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID36531894
PMCPMC9751841
OpenAlexW4294646973

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.