Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36536196›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2023

Surgical Outcome After Pancreatoduodenectomy for Duodenal Adenocarcinoma Compared with Other Periampullary Cancers: A Nationwide Audit Study.

Jacob K de Bakker, J Annelie Suurmeijer, Jurgen G J Toennaer, Bert A Bonsing, Olivier R Busch, Casper H van Eijck, Ignace H de Hingh, Vincent E de Meijer, I Quintus Molenaar, Hjalmar C van Santvoort and 10 more

Open access · hybridFull text readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 16 institutions in 1 country.

Jacob K de BakkerAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Annelie SuurmeijerCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jurgen G J ToennaerAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bert A BonsingDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Olivier R BuschCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Casper H van EijckDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ignace H de HinghDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Vincent E de MeijerDepartment of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
I Quintus MolenaarDepartment of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital and University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hjalmar C van SantvoortDepartment of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital and University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Martijn W StommelDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sebastiaan FestenDepartment of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Erwin van der HarstDepartment of Surgery, Maasstadziekenhuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Gijs PatijnDepartment of Surgery, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Daan J LipsDepartment of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Marcel Den DulkDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Koop BosschaDepartment of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch ziekenhuis, Den Bosch, The Netherlands.
Marc G BesselinkCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.besselink@amsterdamUMC.nl.
Geert KazemierAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. g.kazemier@amsterdamUMC.nl.
Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLCancer Center AmsterdamCatharina Ziekenhuis · NLErasmus MC · NLIsala · NLJeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLMaasstad Ziekenhuis · NLMaastricht University · NLMedisch Spectrum Twente · NLOLVG · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy for duodenal adenocarcinoma could differ from pancreatoduodenectomy for other cancers, but large multicenter series are lacking. This study aimed to determine surgical outcome in patients after pancreatoduodenectomy for duodenal adenocarcinoma, compared with other periampullary cancers, in a nationwide multicenter cohort.

methodsAfter pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer between 2014 and 2019, consecutive patients were included from the nationwide, mandatory Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit. Patients were stratified by diagnosis. Baseline, treatment characteristics, and postoperative outcome were compared between groups. The association between diagnosis and major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher) was assessed via multivariable regression analysis.

resultsOverall, 3113 patients, after pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer, were included in this study: 264 (8.5%) patients with duodenal adenocarcinomas and 2849 (91.5%) with other cancers. After pancreatoduodenectomy for duodenal adenocarcinoma, patients had higher rates of major complications (42.8% vs. 28.6%; p < 0.001), postoperative pancreatic fistula (International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery [ISGPS] grade B/C; 23.1% vs. 13.4%; p < 0.001), complication-related intensive care admission (14.3% vs. 10.3%; p = 0.046), re-interventions (39.8% vs. 26.6%; p < 0.001), in-hospital mortality (5.7% vs. 3.1%; p = 0.025), and longer hospital stay (15 days vs. 11 days; p < 0.001) compared with pancreatoduodenectomy for other cancers. In multivariable analysis, duodenal adenocarcinoma was independently associated with major complications (odds ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.27; p = 0.011).

conclusionPancreatoduodenectomy for duodenal adenocarcinoma is associated with higher rates of major complications, pancreatic fistula, re-interventions, and in-hospital mortality compared with patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for other cancers. These findings should be considered in patient counseling and postoperative management.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaDuodenal NeoplasmsPancreatic NeoplasmsHumansPancreatic FistulaPancreaticoduodenectomyPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID36536196
PMCPMC10027630
OpenAlexW4312018868

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read41
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.