Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36540177›Full record

ReviewAnnals of nuclear cardiology2022

Nuclear Cardiology Data Analyzed Using Machine Learning.

Kenichi Nakajima, Koji Maruyama

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of nuclear cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Artificial Intelligence in Nuclear Cardiology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kenichi NakajimaDepartment of Functional Imaging and Artificial Intelligence, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Kanazawa, Japan.
Koji MaruyamaWolfram Wolfram Research Inc., Champaign, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning has become popular in clinical practice, and the amount of research that uses artificial intelligence is rapidly increasing. In contrast to conventional statistical and rule-based methods, machine learning creates algorithms based only on combinations of input and output databases. Basic understanding of the internal workings of artificial intelligence, its structures and need for appropriate databases, as well as its strengths and weaknesses is important for efficient machine learning application. The cardiological applications of machine learning include diagnosing coronary artery diseases and heart failure, and examples are addressed herein. A preliminary application of machine learning to a

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceClassificationDatabaseOverfittingPrediction

Identifiers

PMID36540177
PMCPMC9749760

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.