Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36542382›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2022

Effectiveness of a Community-Based Structured Physical Activity Program for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Aishee B Mukherji, Di Lu, FeiFei Qin, Haley Hedlin, Neil M Johannsen, Sukyung Chung, Yukari Kobayashi, Francois Haddad, Cynthia Lamendola, Marina Basina and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02061579 (Initiate and Maintain Physical Activity in Clinics), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02061579 nacompletednot on this map

Initiate and Maintain Physical Activity in Clinics: The IMPACT Diabetes Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2016 to 2020Enrolled354ConditionsDiabetes MellitusArmsStructured Group Exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Aishee B MukherjiDivision of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Di LuQuantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
FeiFei QinQuantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Haley HedlinQuantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Neil M JohannsenPennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.
Sukyung ChungQuantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Yukari KobayashiDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Francois HaddadDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Cynthia LamendolaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Marina BasinaDivision of Endocrinology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Ruth TalamoaDivision of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Jonathan MyersCardiology Division, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Latha PalaniappanDivision of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

Funding

Stanford Islet Research CoreP30DK116074 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Seung K Kim · 2017 to 2026
$19.5M
Initiate and Maintain Physical Activity in Clinics: The IMPACT Diabetes StudyR18DK096394 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PALANIAPPAN, LATHA P · 2013 to 2017
$2.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK116074NIDDK NIH HHS R18 DK096394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The efficacy of physical activity interventions among individuals with type 2 diabetes has been established; however, practical approaches to translate and extend these findings into community settings have not been well explored. Objective: To test the effectiveness of providing varying frequencies of weekly structured exercise sessions to improve diabetes control. Design, Setting, and Participants: The IMPACT (Initiate and Maintain Physical Activity in Communities Trial) study was a controlled randomized clinical trial (randomization occurred from October 2016 to April 2019) that included a 6-month, structured exercise intervention either once or thrice weekly vs usual care (UC; advice only). The exercise intervention was conducted at community-based fitness centers. Follow-up visits were conducted in a university research clinic. Participants included adults with type 2 diabetes (hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] 6.5%-13.0%, not taking insulin, and no precluding health issues). Data analysis was performed from January to April 2022. Interventions: A once-weekly structured exercise group, a thrice-weekly structured exercise group, or UC. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was HbA1c at 6 months. Results: A total of 357 participants (143 women [40.1%]) with a mean (SD) age of 57.4 (11.1) years were randomized (119 each to the UC, once-weekly exercise, and thrice-weekly exercise groups). There was no significant difference in HbA1c change by study group in the intention-to-treat analysis at 6 months. Specifically, HbA1c changed by -0.23% (95% CI, -0.48% to 0.01%) in the thrice-weekly exercise group and by -0.16% (95% CI, -0.41% to 0.09%) in the once-weekly exercise group. A total of 62 participants (52.1%) in the once-weekly exercise group and 56 participants (47.1%) in the thrice-weekly exercise group were at least 50% adherent to the assigned structured exercise regimen and were included in the per-protocol analysis. Per-protocol analysis showed that HbA1c changed by -0.35% (95% CI, -0.60% to -0.10%; P = .005) at 3 months and by -0.38% (95% CI, -0.65% to -0.12%; P = .005) at 6 months in the thrice-weekly exercise group compared with UC. There was no significant decrease in HbA1c in the once-weekly exercise group. The exercise intervention was effective in improving self-reported minutes of metabolic equivalent tasks per week for participants in the thrice-weekly exercise group (both overall and per protocol). Conclusions and Relevance: Although the intervention was not effective in the intention-to-treat analysis, participants in the thrice-weekly exercise group who attended at least 50% of the sessions during the 6-month exercise intervention program improved HbA1c levels at 6 months. Future efforts should focus on improving adherence to thrice-weekly structured exercise programs to meet exercise guidelines. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02061579.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2AdultBehavior TherapyExerciseFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansInsulinMiddle AgedGlycated HemoglobinInsulin

Identifiers

PMID36542382
PMCPMC9857601

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.