Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36543095›Full record

ReviewCell reports. Medicine2022

Advancing cardiovascular medicine with machine learning: Progress, potential, and perspective.

Joshua P Barrios, Geoffrey H Tison

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell reports. Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. [Research progress on bioinformatics in pulmonary arterial hypertension].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joshua P BarriosDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco, 555 Mission Bay Blvd South Box 3120, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Geoffrey H TisonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco, 555 Mission Bay Blvd South Box 3120, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA; Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, 555 Mission Bay Blvd South Box 3120, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA. Electronic address: geoff.tison@ucsf.edu.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in machine learning (ML) have made it possible to analyze high-dimensional and complex data-such as free text, images, waveforms, videos, and sound-in an automated manner by successfully learning complex associations within these data. Cardiovascular medicine is particularly well poised to take advantage of these ML advances, due to the widespread digitization of medical data and the large number of diagnostic tests used to evaluate cardiovascular disease. Various ML approaches have successfully been applied to cardiovascular tests and diseases to automate interpretation, accurately perform measurements, and, in some cases, predict novel diagnoses from less invasive tests, effectively expanding the utility of more widely accessible diagnostic tests. Here, we present examples of some impactful advances in cardiovascular medicine using ML across a variety of modalities, with a focus on deep learning applications.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesMachine LearningHumans

Identifiers

PMID36543095
PMCPMC9798021
OpenAlexW4312082893

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.