ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
Long-term clinical outcomes of Chinese diabetic patients after coronary revascularization with drug-eluting stents: a retrospective comparative cohort study.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Compared to bare-metal stent implantation, coronary drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation is more likely to reduce restenosis and the need for a subsequent repeat revascularization procedure. Diabetes increases the risk of coronary heart disease and the population of diabetic patients has increased significantly in China in recent years. It's essential to know more about the outcome in these patients underwent DES implantation. To date, the long-term safety and efficacy of coronary DES implantation in Chinese patients with diabetes has rarely been investigated. Methods: In this study, according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, 580 patients who underwent DES implantations between July 2014 and January 2016 were included and divided into the diabetic group (n=173) and non-diabetic group (n=407). Clinical baseline characteristics and follow-up outcomes were collected from electronic medical record. Serial clinical follow-up was conducted at 1-, 3-, and 5-year. The primary end point was a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), including cardiac death, recurrent myocardial infarction (re-MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) in 5-year follow-up. The long-term outcomes observed in the 5-year follow-up period were compared between the diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Results: Non-cardiac death was more common in the diabetic than non-diabetic patients in the 5-year follow-up period (8.7% Conclusions: Compared to the non-diabetic patients, the diabetic patients were at higher risk for all-cause mortality after coronary DES implantation during the long-term follow-up period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.