Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36544814›Full record

ReviewCurrent research in pharmacology and drug discovery2023

Guiding stem cells for cutaneous repair.

Shivani Desai, Juilee Jagtap, Shivani Sainani, Ramesh Bhonde

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current research in pharmacology and drug discovery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shivani DesaiSerum Institute of India Pvt. Ltd., Pune, India.
Juilee JagtapDr. D. Y. Patil Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, Pune, India.
Shivani SainaniDr. D. Y. Patil Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, Pune, India.
Ramesh BhondeDr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, India.
Delhi Pharmaceutical Science and Research University · INDr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune · INSerum Institute of India (India) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The significance of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for tissue repair and regeneration is widely recognized. The pleiotropic nature of MSCs is demonstrated by their potential for proliferation and differentiation, and paracrine secretions, thereby making them ideal candidates for cell replacement therapy. Tissue resident MSCs are engaged in homeostasis under normal wear and tear. However, stem cell therapy may be applicable if damage cannot be repaired by normal homeostatic mechanisms. The safety of MSCs has been clearly established in clinical trials but their efficacy remains questionable. The efficacy of MSCs depends on several factors, such as their viability, functional status in terms of secretome secretions, and the in-vivo scenario after transplantation. The performance of MSCs is regulated by their micro-environmental conditions and cues. The so-called MSC niche comprises physical, chemical, and biological components, which play key roles in determining the fate of MSCs. MSCs scaled up for transplantation purposes comprise a disorganized mass of cells, which needs to be directed to perform the required function. Thus, MSCs need to be directed toward an expected target activity in human patients. This review focuses on the various methods that can be used to guide stem cells for cutaneous repair.

Indexed as

Clinical efficacyCutaneous repairMesenchymal stem cellsStem cell guidingStem cell niche

Identifiers

PMID36544814
PMCPMC9761596
OpenAlexW4310796426

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.