ArticleHeliyon2022
Evaluation of expert skills in refinery patrol inspection: visual attention and head positioning behavior.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Visual Attention Analysis Method for Industrial Patrol Inspection Based on Eye Tracking and Deep Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to clarify expert skills in refinery patrol inspection using data collected through a virtual reality experimental system. As body positioning and postural changes are relevant factors during refinery patrol inspection tasks, we measured and analyzed both visual attention and head positioning behavior among experts and "knowledgeable novices" who were engaged in the engineering of the refinery but had less inspection experience. The participants performed a simulated inspection task, and the results showed that 1) expert inspectors could find more defects compared to knowledgeable novices, 2) visual attention behavior was similar between knowledgeable novices and experts, and 3) experts tended to position their heads at various heights and further from the inspection target to obtain visual information more effectively from the target compared to knowledgeable novices. This study presented the differences in head positioning behavior between expert and novice inspectors for the first time. These results suggest that to evaluate the skills used in inspecting relatively larger targets, both visual attention and head positioning behavior of the inspectors must be measured.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.