Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36545458›Full record

SynthesisMedical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina)2022

The Combination of CDK 4/6 Inhibitors plus Endocrine Treatment versus Endocrine Treatment Alone in Hormone-receptor (HR)-Positive breast Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Dedy Hermansyah, Naufal Nandita Firsty, Muhammad Nuh Alhudawy, Raja Alwan Nasution

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Hepatotoxicity across CDK 4/6 inhibitors: a Narrative Review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dedy HermansyahDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia.
Naufal Nandita FirstyUndergraduate Program in Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia.
Muhammad Nuh AlhudawyUndergraduate Program in Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia.
Raja Alwan NasutionUndergraduate Program in Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia.
University of North Sumatra · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The identification of the novel targeted therapy i.e., cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) 4/6 inhibitor as combined with the endocrine regimen revealed a considerable capability to increase the managements' effectivity of hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) and HER2- breast cancer (BC). Objective: This study aims to compare the latter combination strategies versus hormonal therapy alone to determine its applicability in the treatment of HR+/HER2- BC. Methods: We established the review based on the clinical trials as collected from several scientific databases from January 2011 to April 2021. RevMan 5.4 was utilized in statistical analysis and risk of bias (RoB) measurement. 5110 participants from 9 different trials were included in this review with similar baseline characteristics. Results: According to our analysis of the intention-to-treat (ITT) group, CDK 4/6 inhibitor arms exhibited better overall response rate (ORR) as indicated by the relative risk (RR) (randomized-effect model (REM), 1.59 [1.37, 1.86]; 95% confidence interval (CI); P <0.00001) and higher clinical benefit rate (CBR) (RR, 1.22 [1.13, 1.32]; 95% CI; REM; P <0.00001). The combination regiment also proved to be effective in reducing the rate of progressive disease (PD) in the ITT group (RR 0.46 [0.39, 0.54]; CI 95%; FEM; P <0.00001. Although the rate of adverse effects especially the hematological reactions was significantly lower in the endocrine alone arm, other system reactions were fairly comparable. Conclusion: The introduction of CDK 4/6 inhibitor to the endocrine-based regiment is proved beneficial to patients with HR+/HER2- BC even though the most recommended anti-hormonal to be combined remains questionable.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHormonesHumansErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesHormonesBreast cancerCDK 4/6 inhibitorEndocrine treatment

Identifiers

PMID36545458
PMCPMC9760242
OpenAlexW4312113786

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.