Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36548330›Full record

ArticlePharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Cross-Sectional Survey Study Examining the Provision of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Education in U.S. Doctor of Pharmacy Programs.

Emily Knezevich, Kevin T Fuji, Krysta Larson, Gabrielle Muniz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily KnezevichDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Creighton University School of Pharmacy & Health Professions, Omaha, NE 68178, USA.
Kevin T FujiDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Creighton University School of Pharmacy & Health Professions, Omaha, NE 68178, USA.
Krysta LarsonPharm.D. Candidates, Creighton University School of Pharmacy & Health Professions, Omaha, NE 68178, USA.
Gabrielle MunizPharm.D. Candidates, Creighton University School of Pharmacy & Health Professions, Omaha, NE 68178, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is used to help patients with diabetes and their healthcare providers more effectively manage care. CGM use is expanding to all healthcare settings where pharmacists practice and new pharmacy graduates may increasingly be asked to assist patients utilizing CGM devices and assess diabetes management through the interpretation of CGM data. The purpose of this study was to describe CGM education across Doctor of Pharmacy (Pharm.D.) programs in the United States. An online survey was administered to 139 accredited Pharm.D. programs. Information was solicited about CGM education, including curricular placement, course type, hands-on experience, and credential(s) of faculty providing the education. Fifty-seven programs responded with 51 (89.5%) providing CGM education for a median of 1.0 h. Of programs providing detailed responses, content was delivered in required (60.4%) or elective (45.8%) lectures as well as experiential settings (41.7%). Education occurred most frequently in the third year (58.3%), followed by the second (43.8%) and fourth (37.5%) years. Thirty-one (66.0%) programs were taught by a faculty member with an advanced diabetes credential. The results from this study confirm that there is an ongoing need to examine optimal amount, timing, and methods for providing CGM education.

Indexed as

continuous glucose monitoringdiabetesdiabetes educationdiabetes self-managementpharmacy educationpharmacy students

Identifiers

PMID36548330
PMCPMC9785425

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.