Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36548742›Full record

ReviewToxins2022

Comprehensive Review of Aflatoxin Contamination, Impact on Health and Food Security, and Management Strategies in Pakistan.

Maryam Ajmal, Wendy Bedale, Abida Akram, Jae-Hyuk Yu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Interaction BetweenToxins · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Aflatoxins in Peanut (ACS omega · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Research advances in the degradation of aflatoxin by lactic acid bacteria.The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maryam AjmalDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Sciences, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi 46300, Pakistan.
Wendy BedaleFood Research Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0122-4255
Abida AkramDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Sciences, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi 46300, Pakistan.
Jae-Hyuk YuFood Research Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6530-8407

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aflatoxins (AFs) are the most important toxic, mutagenic, and carcinogenic fungal toxins that routinely contaminate food and feed. While more than 20 AFs have been identified to date, aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), B2 (AFB2), G1 (AFG1), G2 (AFG2), and M1 (AFM1) are the most common. Over 25 species of

Indexed as

AflatoxinsAflatoxin B1AnimalsAspergillus flavusFood ContaminationFood SecurityHumansPakistanAflatoxin B1Aflatoxinsaflatoxinsagricultural productscontrolfood safety and securitymanagementPakistan

Identifiers

PMID36548742
PMCPMC9781569

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.