Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36548954›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2023

Variation in mutational (co)variances.

François Mallard, Luke Noble, Charles F Baer, Henrique Teotónio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Phenotypic stasis with genetic divergence.Peer community journal · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

François MallardInstitut de Biologie de l'École Normale Supérieure, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR 8197, Inserm U1024, F-75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2087-1914
Luke NobleInstitut de Biologie de l'École Normale Supérieure, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR 8197, Inserm U1024, F-75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5161-4059
Charles F BaerDepartment of Biology, University of Florida Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainsville, FL 32611, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0140-5814
Henrique TeotónioInstitut de Biologie de l'École Normale Supérieure, PSL Research University, CNRS UMR 8197, Inserm U1024, F-75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1057-6882

Funding

Determination of the distribution of fitness effects of mutations in C. elegansR01GM107227 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BAER, CHARLES F · 2014 to 2017
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because of pleiotropy, mutations affect the expression and inheritance of multiple traits and, together with selection, are expected to shape standing genetic covariances between traits and eventual phenotypic divergence between populations. It is therefore important to find if the M matrix, describing mutational variances of each trait and covariances between traits, varies between genotypes. We here estimate the M matrix for six locomotion behavior traits in lines of two genotypes of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans that accumulated mutations in a nearly neutral manner for 250 generations. We find significant mutational variance along at least one phenotypic dimension of the M matrices, but neither their size nor their orientation had detectable differences between genotypes. The number of generations of mutation accumulation, or the number of MA lines measured, was likely insufficient to sample enough mutations and detect potentially small differences between the two M matrices. We then tested if the M matrices were similar to one G matrix describing the standing genetic (co)variances of a population derived by the hybridization of several genotypes, including the two measured for M, and domesticated to a lab-defined environment for 140 generations. We found that the M and G were different because the genetic covariances caused by mutational pleiotropy in the two genotypes are smaller than those caused by linkage disequilibrium in the lab population. We further show that M matrices differed in their alignment with the lab population G matrix. If generalized to other founder genotypes of the lab population, these observations indicate that selection does not shape the evolution of the M matrix for locomotion behavior in the short-term of a few tens to hundreds of generations and suggests that the hybridization of C. elegans genotypes allows selection on new phenotypic dimensions of locomotion behavior.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansGenetic VariationAnimalsInheritance PatternsModels, GeneticMutationPhenotypeSelection, GeneticCaenorhabditis elegansexperimental evolutionG-matrixlocomotion behaviorM-matrixmultivariate selectiontransition rates

Identifiers

PMID36548954
PMCPMC9911065

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.