Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36550107›Full record

ArticleCell discovery2022

Structural insights into the covalent regulation of PAPP-A activity by proMBP and STC2.

Qihang Zhong, Honglei Chu, Guopeng Wang, Cheng Zhang, Rong Li, Fusheng Guo, Xinlu Meng, Xiaoguang Lei, Youli Zhou, Ruobing Ren and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell discovery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Insulin-like growth factor receptor signaling in physiology and disease.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Qihang Zhong *Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Honglei Chu *Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Guopeng Wang *State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Cheng Zhang *Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Rong LiCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Fusheng GuoBeijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry and Molecular Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Chemical Biology, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Synthetic and Functional Biomolecules Center, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Xinlu MengCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiaoguang LeiBeijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry and Molecular Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Chemical Biology, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Synthetic and Functional Biomolecules Center, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0380-8035
Youli ZhouSchool of Life and Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Ruobing RenSchool of Life and Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4517-7216
Lin TaoDepartment of Orthopedics, First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Ningning LiState Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8601-5171
Ning GaoState Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3067-9993
Yuan WeiCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China. weiyuanbysy@163.com.
Jie QiaoCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China. jie.qiao@263.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2126-1376
Jing HangCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China. hangjbysy@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0334-6467
Peking University · CNMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of China · CNChinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen · CNFirst Hospital of China Medical University · CNFudan University · CN

Funding

Beijing Nova Program Z201100006820010National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 82071658
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Originally discovered in the circulation of pregnant women as a protein secreted by placental trophoblasts, the metalloprotease pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) is also widely expressed by many other tissues. It cleaves insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins (IGFBPs) to increase the bioavailability of IGFs and plays essential roles in multiple growth-promoting processes. While the vast majority of the circulatory PAPP-A in pregnancy is proteolytically inactive due to covalent inhibition by proform of eosinophil major basic protein (proMBP), the activity of PAPP-A can also be covalently inhibited by another less characterized modulator, stanniocalcin-2 (STC2). However, the structural basis of PAPP-A proteolysis and the mechanistic differences between these two modulators are poorly understood. Here we present two cryo-EM structures of endogenous purified PAPP-A in complex with either proMBP or STC2. Both modulators form 2:2 heterotetramer with PAPP-A and establish extensive interactions with multiple domains of PAPP-A that are distal to the catalytic cleft. This exosite-binding property results in a steric hindrance to prevent the binding and cleavage of IGFBPs, while the IGFBP linker region-derived peptides harboring the cleavage sites are no longer sensitive to the modulator treatment. Functional investigation into proMBP-mediated PAPP-A regulation in selective intrauterine growth restriction (sIUGR) pregnancy elucidates that PAPP-A and proMBP collaboratively regulate extravillous trophoblast invasion and the consequent fetal growth. Collectively, our work reveals a novel covalent exosite-competitive inhibition mechanism of PAPP-A and its regulatory effect on placental function.

Identifiers

PMID36550107
PMCPMC9780223
OpenAlexW4312140321

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.