Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36550427›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Exploring women's experiences during childbirth in health facilities during COVID-19 pandemic in occupied palestinian territory: a cross-sectional community survey.

Niveen Me Abu-Rmeileh, Yasmeen Wahdan, Hedieh Mehrtash, Khitam Abu Hamad, Arein Awad, Ӧzge Tunçalp

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Niveen Me Abu-RmeilehInstitute of Community and Public Health, Birzeit University, Ramallah, West Bank, Occupied Palestinian territory, Palestine. nrmeileh@birzeit.edu.
Yasmeen WahdanInstitute of Community and Public Health, Birzeit University, Ramallah, West Bank, Occupied Palestinian territory, Palestine.
Hedieh MehrtashWHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Khitam Abu HamadSchool of Public Health, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Occupied Palestinian territory, Palestine.
Arein AwadInstitute of Community and Public Health, Birzeit University, Ramallah, West Bank, Occupied Palestinian territory, Palestine.
Ӧzge TunçalpWHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Birzeit University · PSWorld Health Organization · CHAl-Quds University · PS

Funding

UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), a cosponsored program executed by the World Health Organization (WHO). Reference Number 2019/956088-0World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study aims to assess the prevalence of mistreatment during childbirth in the occupied Palestinian territory and to explore factors associated with mistreatment.

methodsA cross-sectional study of women who gave birth in the West Bank and Gaza Strip health facilities. The survey was administered over the phone to women up to 8 weeks post-partum. Data collection took place between July 2020 and March 2021.

resultsA total of 745 women participated in the study, 36·25% were from the Gaza Strip and 63·75% from the West Bank. The prevalence of mistreatment was 18·8% in which women reported any verbal abuse, physical abuse, or stigma or discrimination during childbirth, with verbal abuse as the most common form of mistreatment reported. Physical abuse was more likely to be reported by women with no labour companion with them (OR: 3·11, 95%CI: 1·24 - 7·99). Verbal abuse was more likely to be reported by women with less than three live births (OR: 1·71, 95%CI: 1·06 - 2·76, women with no birth companion (OR: 2·72, 95%CI: 1·36 - 3·80) and more likely to be reported if curtains wre not used (OR: 2·55, 95%CI: 1·33 - 4·88). Women with less education were more likely to report long waiting times or delays in receiving services compared to women with higher education (OR: 1·40, 95%CI: 1·06 - 2·10).

conclusionFor the first time using the World Health Organisation (WHO) tool in the Eastern Mediterranean region, the study findings, show the occurrence of mistreatment and identify areas to be strengthened to ensure that all women have a respectful childbirth experience within health facilities.

Indexed as

COVID-19Maternal Health ServicesArabsAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHealth FacilitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPandemicsParturitionPregnancyQuality of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19Health facilityMistreatmentPalestineQuality of care

Identifiers

PMID36550427
PMCPMC9773592
OpenAlexW4312190326

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.