Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36551996›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2022

Evaluation and Comparison of Multi-Omics Data Integration Methods for Subtyping of Cutaneous Melanoma.

Adriana Amaro, Max Pfeffer, Ulrich Pfeffer, Francesco Reggiani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Machine Learning Methods for Gene Selection in Uveal Melanoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Interdependence of Molecular Lesions That Drive Uveal Melanoma Metastasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adriana AmaroIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1573-7756
Max PfefferFaculty of Mathematics, Technical University of Chemnitz, 09111 Chemnitz, Germany.
Ulrich PfefferIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0872-4671
Francesco ReggianiIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) 448293816FONDAZIONE AIRC under 5 per Mille 2018-ID.21073 program-P.I. Maio Michele to U.P.Italian Ministry of Health 5 x 1000 2018/19 to A.A.Italian Ministry of Health ricerca corrente 2022 to U.P
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing number of multi-domain genomic datasets for human tumors. Multi-domain data are usually interpreted after separately analyzing single-domain data and integrating the results post hoc. Data fusion techniques allow for the real integration of multi-domain data to ideally improve the tumor classification results for the prognosis and prediction of response to therapy. We have previously described the joint singular value decomposition (jSVD) technique as a means of data fusion. Here, we report on the development of these methods in open source code based on R and Python and on the application of these data fusion methods. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Skin Cutaneous Melanoma (SKCM) dataset was used as a benchmark to evaluate the potential of the data fusion approaches to improve molecular classification of cancers in a clinically relevant manner. Our data show that the data fusion approach does not generate classification results superior to those obtained using single-domain data. Data from different domains are not entirely independent from each other, and molecular classes are characterized by features that penetrate different domains. Data fusion techniques might be better suited for response prediction, where they could contribute to the identification of predictive features in a domain-independent manner to be used as biomarkers.

Indexed as

cancer genomicsdata fusionmulti-domain datatumor classification

Identifiers

PMID36551996
PMCPMC9775581

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.