Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36556922›Full record

ArticleMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2022

Pulsed Magnetic Stimulation for Stress Urinary Incontinence and Its Impact on Sexuality and Health.

Pablo González-Isaza, Rafael Sánchez-Borrego, Félix Lugo Salcedo, Nuria Rodríguez, Diana Vélez Rizo, Irene Fusco, Silvia Callarelli

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07528560 (Effectiveness of HIFEM), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07528560 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of HIFEM (High Intensity Focused Electro-Magnetic Technology) for Improving Pelvic Floor Muscle Tone in Postpartum Women: Study Protocol.

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut Investigacio Sanitaria Pere VirgiliRan2026 to 2026Enrolled60ConditionsPelvic Floor Muscle DysfunctionArmsHIFEM (HIGH INTENSITY FOCUSED ELECTROMAGNETIC) BTL EMSELLA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Pablo González-IsazaGinecología y Obstetricia, Centro Médico Teknon, 08017 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7798-5141
Rafael Sánchez-BorregoGinecología y Obstetricia, Centro Médico Teknon, 08017 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6583-7440
Félix Lugo SalcedoGinecología y Obstetricia, Centro Médico Teknon, 08017 Barcelona, Spain.
Nuria RodríguezGinecología y Obstetricia, Centro Médico Teknon, 08017 Barcelona, Spain.
Diana Vélez RizoGinecología y Obstetricia, Ginecología Avanzada, Bogotá 110311, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-4415-3370
Irene FuscoEl.En. Group, 50041 Calenzano, Italy.
Silvia CallarelliStudio Medicò Surgical Laser, 51017 Pescia, Italy.
Hospital Quirón Teknon · ESCentro Laser · ITEl.En. Group (Italy) · ITFederación Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is becoming increasingly common that patients' preferences move towards non-surgical approaches, such as pulsed magnetic stimulation, for female stress urinary incontinence.

objectiveWe evaluated the efficacy and safety of a device that uses electromagnetic technology to treat urinary incontinence, with an emphasis on health-related quality of life.

methodsA total of 47 female subjects from 18 to 80 years old were enrolled. After block randomization, treatment consisted of 2 pulsed planar magnetic stimulation sessions per week for 4 weeks (8 sessions). Validated questionnaires: Female Sexual Function Index, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire for Urinary Incontinence: Short Form, and Pelvic Floor Bothersome. Follow-ups were performed at weeks 1, 9, and 14.

resultsThe present study is one of the first clinical trials published evaluating the efficacy and safety of the electromagnetism-based device with flat configuration in patients with stress urinary incontinence, showing a reduction in PFBQ, ICQSF, and Oxford test scores during follow-up, and significantly at week 14 of follow-up, which implied a favorable impact on clinical outcomes, quality of life, and sexuality.

conclusionsThe improved results in the treatment group compared with the simulated group show that pulsed magnetic stimulation is a safe and attractive non-invasive alternative for patients who prefer non-surgical treatments.

Indexed as

Urinary IncontinenceUrinary Incontinence, StressAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMagnetic PhenomenaMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSexualityTreatment OutcomeYoung Adultmagnetic field therapypelvic floor dysfunctionsexualitystressurinary incontinence quality of life

Identifiers

PMID36556922
PMCPMC9784697
OpenAlexW4309855403

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.