Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36557203›Full record

ReviewMetabolites2022

Human Gut Microbiota in Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Marcin Choroszy, Kamil Litwinowicz, Robert Bednarz, Tomasz Roleder, Amir Lerman, Takumi Toya, Karol Kamiński, Emilia Sawicka-Śmiarowska, Magdalena Niemira, Beata Sobieszczańska

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Metabolites, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. [Gut-vascular axis in Kawasaki disease: short-chain fatty acid-mediated immune regulation and therapeutic targets].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Marcin ChoroszyDepartment of Microbiology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland.
Kamil LitwinowiczDepartment of Biochemistry and Immunochemistry, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1856-7246
Robert BednarzNinewells Hospital and Medical School, James Arrott Drive, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0072-9454
Tomasz RolederResearch and Development Centre, Regional Specialist Hospital, 51-124 Wroclaw, Poland.
Amir LermanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Takumi ToyaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Karol KamińskiDepartment of Population Medicine and Lifestyle Diseases Prevention, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-269 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9465-2581
Emilia Sawicka-ŚmiarowskaDepartment of Population Medicine and Lifestyle Diseases Prevention, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-269 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8306-1882
Magdalena NiemiraClinical Research Centre, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-089 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0701-4961
Beata SobieszczańskaDepartment of Microbiology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3355-2480
Medical University of Białystok · PLWroclaw Medical University · PLMayo Clinic in Arizona · USNinewells Hospital · GBWroclaw Research Centre EIT+ (Poland) · PL

Funding

Ministry of Education and Science in the "Regional Initiative of Excellence" " program for the years 2019-2022, project number 016/RID/2018/19 RID Z501.20.009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the importance of the gut microbiome in human health and disease has increased. Growing evidence suggests that gut dysbiosis might be a crucial risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD). Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether or not CAD is associated with specific changes in the gut microbiome. The V3-V4 regions of the 16S rDNA from fecal samples were analyzed to compare the gut microbiome composition between CAD patients and controls. Our search yielded 1181 articles, of which 21 met inclusion criteria for systematic review and 7 for meta-analysis. The alpha-diversity, including observed OTUs, Shannon and Simpson indices, was significantly decreased in CAD, indicating the reduced richness of the gut microbiome. The most consistent results in a systematic review and meta-analysis pointed out the reduced abundance of

Indexed as

atherosclerosiscoronary artery diseasedysbiosisgut microbiomeLPSSCFA

Identifiers

PMID36557203
PMCPMC9788186
OpenAlexW4310036594

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.