Evidence mapPaperPMID 36558193Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Screening of the Active Compounds against Neural Oxidative Damage from Ginseng Phloem Using UPLC-Q-Exactive-MS/MS Coupled with the Content-Effect Weighted Method.

Xiao-Chen Gao, Nan-Xi Zhang, Jia-Ming Shen, Jing-Wei Lv, Kai-Yue Zhang, Yao Sun, Hang Li, Yue-Long Wang, Duan-Duan Cheng, Meng-Ya Zhao and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiao-Chen GaoJilin Ginseng Academy, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun 130117, China.
Nan-Xi ZhangJilin Ginseng Academy, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun 130117, China.
Jia-Ming ShenJilin Ginseng Academy, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun 130117, China.
Jing-Wei LvJilin Ginseng Academy, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun 130117, China.
Kai-Yue ZhangJilin Ginseng Academy, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun 130117, China.
Yao SunSchool of Chemistry and Life Sciences, Changchun University of Technology, Changchun 130012, China.
Hang LiSchool of Chemistry and Life Sciences, Changchun University of Technology, Changchun 130012, China.
Yue-Long WangJilin Ginseng Academy, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun 130117, China.
Duan-Duan ChengJilin Ginseng Academy, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun 130117, China.
Meng-Ya ZhaoJilin Ginseng Academy, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun 130117, China.
Hui ZhangJilin Ginseng Academy, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun 130117, China.
Chun-Nan LiJilin Ginseng Academy, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun 130117, China.
Jia-Ming SunJilin Ginseng Academy, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun 130117, China.
Changchun University of Chinese Medicine · CNChangchun University of Technology

Funding

Health and Wellness Innovation Project of Jilin Province No.2018J111Industrialization research project of Jilin Province Education Department No.JJKH20210992KJJilin Provincial Department of Education No.JJKH20200905KJNational Natural Science Foundation of China No.31570347Science and Technology Development Project of Jilin Province No.20200404081YY
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neuroprotective properties of ginsenosides have been found to reverse the neurological damage caused by oxidation in many neurodegenerative diseases. However, the distribution of ginsenosides in different tissues of the main root, which was regarded as the primary medicinal portion in clinical practice was different, the specific parts and specific components against neural oxidative damage were not clear. The present study aims to screen and determine the potential compounds in different parts of the main root in ginseng. Comparison of the protective effects in the main root, phloem and xylem of ginseng on hydrogen peroxide-induced cell death of SH-SY5Y neurons was investigated. UPLC-Q-Exactive-MS/MS was used to quickly and comprehensively characterize the chemical compositions of the active parts. Network pharmacology combined with a molecular docking approach was employed to virtually screen for disease-related targets and potential active compounds. By comparing the changes before and after Content-Effect weighting, the compounds with stronger anti-nerve oxidative damage activity were screened out more accurately. Finally, the activity of the selected monomer components was verified. The results suggested that the phloem of ginseng was the most effective part. There were 19 effective compounds and 14 core targets, and enriched signaling pathway and biological functions were predicted. After Content-Effect weighting, compounds Ginsenosides F1, Ginsenosides Rf, Ginsenosides Rg

Indexed as

GinsenosidesNeuroblastomaPanaxChromatography, High Pressure LiquidHumansMolecular Docking SimulationOxidative StressPhloemTandem Mass SpectrometryGinsenosidescontent-effect weightingginsengUPLC-Q-Exactive-MS/MS

Identifiers

PMID36558193
PMCPMC9781605
OpenAlexW4312194868

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.