Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36564351›Full record

ArticleChemistryOpen2022

Greener Cleavage of Protected Peptide Fragments from Sieber Amide Resin.

Othman Al Musaimi, Varshitha Gavva, Daryl R Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ChemistryOpen, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Othman Al MusaimiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Varshitha GavvaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4647-444X
Daryl R WilliamsDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5626-5903

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the successful introduction of two benign solvents for cleaving protected acid peptide fragments from 2-chlorotrityl chloride (2-CTC) resin, there is a need to green the cleavage process for obtaining protected peptide amide fragments. In this work, p-xylene and toluene are introduced as greener alternates to dichloromethane (DCM) for preparing protected peptide amide fragments from a Sieber amide resin. The N-dealkylation is a demanding chemical reaction, requiring that the cleavage protocol be optimised to ensure complete cleavage from the resin. After a 30 min reaction time, only 66 % of the final peptide product was retrieved even with the conventional dichloromethane solvent. Therefore, 120 min was considered sufficient to fully cleave the peptide from the Sieber amide resin. This work reaffirms the fact that greening strategies are far from detrimental, with green alternatives often outperforming their replaced counterparts.

Indexed as

AmidesPeptide FragmentsAmino AcidsMethylene ChloridePeptidesResins, PlantAmidesAmino AcidsMethylene ChloridePeptide FragmentsPeptidesResins, Plantfragments condensationgreen chemistrypeptide cleavageprotected peptide amideSieber amide resin

Identifiers

PMID36564351
PMCPMC9789020

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.