ReviewInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2022
"Obesity paradox" and takotsubo syndrome.
Review in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- The obesity paradox revisited - influence on the results of percutaneous coronary interventions.AsiaIntervention · 2025Article
- Obesity Paradox in Takotsubo Syndrome Among Septic ICU Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Body Mass Index and Outcomes in Patients with Takotsubo Syndrome: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study.Cardiology · 2024Article
- Relationship between Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Composite Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized with Takotsubo Syndrome: A Nationwide Analysis.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: An "obesity paradox" has been reported in patients with hypertension and heart failure, in which obese patients fare better than patients with normal-weight. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is an "obesity paradox" in patients with takotsubo syndrome (TTS). Methods: The prevalence of obesity in databases/registries of patients with TTS was compared to the prevalence of obesity in world general populations. Obese patients with TTS were explored regarding the stress triggers precipitating the illness, hospital outcome, and post-discharge readmission. Finally, the literature on the "obesity paradox" was explored to understand how it could be applied to TTS. Results: A prevalence of obesity of ∼10-11% has been reported in large cohorts of patients with TTS, which represents 1/3 to ¼ of the prevalence reported in worldwide general populations, suggesting that, normal-weight than obese individuals, are more predisposed to develop TTS, with the latter nevertheless also suffering TTS, when triggered by enormous physical stresses. Obese patients with TTS are likely to have milder hospital outcomes, lower mortality, and lower rate of early readmission. A greater sympathetic nervous system (SNS) response in a number of hyperadrenergic states in normal-weight than obese patients, may explain findings in patients with TTS. Conclusions: An "obesity paradox" has been identified in patients with TTS. Reporting on body mass index and other markers of obesity in patients with TTS, and implementing some recommendations on monitoring noninvasively the SNS in patients with TTS, may solidify that obesity has a preventive/ameliorating effect for TTS development and its clinical course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.