ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2022
Rescue
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inverted microscopy-based assessment reveals major maturation gap between denuded and non-denuded GV oocytes: A novel r-IVM approach.Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Article
- Inverted microscopy as a high performance tool for pre denudation evaluation of oocyte nuclear maturity.Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Article
- A Comparative Analysis ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Rescue In Vitro Maturation of a Germinal Vesicle Oocyte Leading to Pregnancy in a Case of Unexplained Infertility.Cureus · 2025Article
- Rescue in vitro maturation of germinal vesicle oocytes after ovarian stimulation: the importance of the culture media.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Successful Clinical Outcome After a Modified Protocol of Rescue In Vitro Maturation of Oocytes: A Case Series Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- Advanced Maternal Age Affects the Cryosusceptibility of Ovulated but not In Vitro Matured Mouse Oocytes.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2024Article
- Cut-off point of mature oocyte for routine clinical application of rescue IVM: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of ovarian research · 2023Article
- The spectrum ofFrontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To investigate whether rescue in vitro maturation (R-IVM) improves the reproductive outcomes among women undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) after one oocyte retrieved cycle. Methods: Between January 2019 and December 2020, 2602 women who underwent ICSI in the Reproductive Medicine Center of Tongji Hospital, Wuhan, China, were included in our retrospective cohort study. There were 2112 women undergoing only ICSI and 490 women with R-IVM followed by ICSI. The intermediate reproductive outcomes and pregnancy outcomes were assessed, including the number of normally fertilized embryos, number of cleaved embryos, number of good-quality embryos, number of day-3 available embryos, number of embryos cultured past day-3, number of blastocysts, number of available blastocysts, biochemical pregnancy, miscarriage, clinical pregnancy and live birth. The perinatal outcomes were also assessed, including preterm birth and birth weight. The abovementioned outcomes were also calculated for in vivo matured and R-IVM oocytes separately in women undergoing ICSI with R-IVM group. Results: Compared with the women who underwent only ICSI, those who underwent ICSI with R-IVM had higher numbers of MII oocytes, normally fertilized embryos, cleaved embryos, day-3 available embryos, embryos cultured past day-3, and higher oocyte maturation rate, available embryo rate than women undergoing only ICSI. Additionally, we found that women undergoing ICSI with R-IVM had an increased chance of clinical pregnancy (adjusted OR=1.50, 95% CI: 1.17-1.93) and cumulative live birth (adjusted OR=1.35, 95% CI: 1.07-1.71). After propensity score matching (PSM), the cumulative live birth rate was 60.1% for women undergoing ICSI with R-IVM versus 54.9% for women undergoing only ICSI (OR=1.24, 95% CI: 0.94-1.63). The reproductive outcomes were also significantly different when calculated for in vivo matured and R-IVM oocytes separately in women undergoing ICSI with R-IVM group. All live births from R-IVM embryos were healthy and without malformations or complications. Conclusion: R-IVM may improve the reproductive outcomes of women undergoing ICSI. It may also provide a reference for the safety of R-IVM. This study maybe support a routine application of R-IVM among patients who intend to undergo ICSI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.