ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2022
Impact of daily vitamin D
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Interplay Between Thyroid Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease: Shared Mechanisms, Treatment Implications, and Survivorship Perspectives.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2026Review
- Vitamin D Status in Polish Military Personnel: Associations with Supplementation, Seasonality, and the GC rs2282679 Polymorphism.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Uncovering hidden vitamin D deficiency in overweight children.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2025Review
- The Multi-Dimensional Role of Vitamin D in the Pathophysiology and Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Translation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Article
- Vitamin D-Binding Protein and the Role of its Gene Polymorphisms in the Mortality of Sepsis Patients.Acta medica academica · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The rs2282679 polymorphism in the vitamin D binding protein (DBP) gene may influence the response to vitamin D supplementation. Therefore, we examine the effect of 1-year vitamin D supplementation on vitamin D deficiency (VDD) with the interaction of rs2282679 polymorphism in overweight and obese children and adolescents. Materials and methods: The participants ( Results: The mean of 25(OH)D values at baseline for participants with the TT, TG, and GG genotypes were 15.4, 14.4, and 10.8 ng/mL, respectively, and were not different between the three genotype groups ( Conclusion: Response to vitamin D supplementation by three doses of 600, 1,000, and 2,000 IU could not be affected by rs2282679 polymorphism during 12 months in overweight and obese children and adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.