Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36580149›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2023

How effective are physiotherapy interventions in treating people with sciatica? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lucy Dove, Gillian Jones, Lee Anne Kelsey, Melinda C Cairns, Annina B Schmid

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Are combined conservative interventions effective in reducing pain, disability and/or global rating of pain in people with sciatica with known neuropathic pain mechanisms?European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Development and Content Validation of an Exercise-Based Framework for the Management of Lumbar Radiculopathy.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Prevalence of weakness and factors mediating discrepancy between reported and observed leg weakness in people with sciatica.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Early surgery for sciatica.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Lucy DoveNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, The University of Oxford, West Wing Level 6, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2329-7199
Gillian JonesDepartment of Sport, Health Sciences and Social Work, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4733-4679
Lee Anne KelseyOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4629-7607
Melinda C CairnsSchool of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0736-1090
Annina B SchmidNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, The University of Oxford, West Wing Level 6, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK. annina.schmid@neuro-research.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-7759-0211
BG Group (United Kingdom) · GBJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBNuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBOxford Brookes University · GBOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of HealthWellcome TrustWellcome Trust 222101/Z/20/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePhysiotherapy interventions are prescribed as first-line treatment for people with sciatica; however, their effectiveness remains controversial. The purpose of this systematic review was to establish the short-, medium- and long-term effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions compared to control interventions for people with clinically diagnosed sciatica.

methodsThis systematic review was registered on PROSPERO CRD42018103900. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), CINAHL (EBSCO), Embase, PEDro, PubMed, Scopus and grey literature were searched from inception to January 2021 without language restrictions. Inclusion criteria were randomised controlled trials evaluating physiotherapy interventions compared to a control intervention in people with clinical or imaging diagnosis of sciatica. Primary outcome measures were pain and disability. Study selection and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers with consensus reached by discussion or third-party arbitration if required. Risk of bias was assessed independently by two reviewers using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool with third-party consensus if required. Meta-analyses and sensitivity analyses were performed with random effects models using Revman v5.4. Subgroup analyses were undertaken to examine the effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions compared to minimal (e.g. advice only) or substantial control interventions (e.g. surgery).

resultsThree thousand nine hundred and fifty eight records were identified, of which 18 trials were included, with a total number of 2699 participants. All trials had a high or unclear risk of bias. Meta-analysis of trials for the outcome of pain showed no difference in the short (SMD - 0.34 [95%CI - 1.05, 0.37] p = 0.34, I

conclusionBased on currently available, mostly high risk of bias and highly heterogeneous data, there is inadequate evidence to make clinical recommendations on the effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions for people with clinically diagnosed sciatica. Future studies should aim to reduce clinical heterogeneity and to use contemporary physiotherapy interventions.

Indexed as

SciaticaHumansPhysical Therapy ModalitiesLumbar radiculopathyPhysiotherapyRadicular painSciaticaSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36580149
PMCPMC9925551
OpenAlexW4313263703

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.