Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36580597›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Minimal frustration underlies the usefulness of incomplete regulatory network models in biology.

Shubham Tripathi, David A Kessler, Herbert Levine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A computational approach for perturbation-induced EMT transitions.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025
    Article
  5. Chemical compensation to mechanical loss in cell mechanosensation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cell reprogramming design by transfer learning of functional transcriptional networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shubham TripathiPhD Program in Systems, Synthetic, and Physical Biology, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005.ORCID 0000-0002-0141-987X
David A KesslerDepartment of Physics, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-5279-1655
Herbert LevineCenter for Theoretical Biological Physics, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115.ORCID 0000-0002-8819-9055

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regulatory networks as large and complex as those implicated in cell-fate choice are expected to exhibit intricate, very high-dimensional dynamics. Cell-fate choice, however, is a macroscopically simple process. Additionally, regulatory network models are almost always incomplete and/or inexact, and do not incorporate all the regulators and interactions that may be involved in cell-fate regulation. In spite of these issues, regulatory network models have proven to be incredibly effective tools for understanding cell-fate choice across contexts and for making useful predictions. Here, we show that minimal frustration-a feature of biological networks across contexts but not of random networks-can compel simple, low-dimensional steady-state behavior even in large and complex networks. Moreover, the steady-state behavior of minimally frustrated networks can be recapitulated by simpler networks such as those lacking many of the nodes and edges and those that treat multiple regulators as one. The present study provides a theoretical explanation for the success of network models in biology and for the challenges in network inference.

Indexed as

BiologyFrustrationAlgorithmsCell DifferentiationComputational BiologyGene Regulatory Networkscell-fate choicefrustrationgene regulatory networksnetwork inferencesloppiness

Identifiers

PMID36580597
PMCPMC9910462

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.