Evidence mapPaperPMID 36585131Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Restoring mortality data in the FOURIER cardiovascular outcomes trial of evolocumab in patients with cardiovascular disease: a reanalysis based on regulatory data.

Juan Erviti, James Wright, Ken Bassett, Mohamed Ben-Eltriki, Ciprian Jauca, Luis Carlos Saiz, Leire Leache, Marta Gutiérrez-Valencia, Thomas L Perry

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT01764633. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01764633 phase3completed

A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study Assessing the Impact of Additional LDL-Cholesterol Reduction on Major Cardiovascular Events When Evolocumab (AMG 145) is Used in Combination With Statin Therapy In Patients With Clinically Evident Cardiovascular Disease

Ran2013Enrolled27,564Registered outcomes9Posted comparisons9ConditionsDyslipidemiaArmsEvolocumab, Placebo
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. PCSK9 Inhibitors: The Evolving Future.Health science reports · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Juan ErvitiInnovation and Organization Unit, Navarre Health Service, Pamplona, Spain jervitil@navarra.es.ORCID 0000-0003-3396-2102
James WrightDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1136-8145
Ken BassettDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Mohamed Ben-EltrikiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2129-981X
Ciprian JaucaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Luis Carlos SaizInnovation and Organization Unit, Navarre Health Service, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9143-5709
Leire LeacheInnovation and Organization Unit, Navarre Health Service, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2272-7086
Marta Gutiérrez-ValenciaInnovation and Organization Unit, Navarre Health Service, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3229-6614
Thomas L PerryDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CANavarre Institute of Health Research · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe FOURIER trial showed a benefit of the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab over placebo with respect to cardiovascular outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. However, we observed some inconsistencies between the information in the Clinical Study Report (CSR) and that in the 2017 primary trial results publication. We aimed to restore the mortality data in the FOURIER trial based on the information contained in the death narratives in the CSR.

methodsMortality data in the primary results publication were compared with that in the CSR. In cases of discrepancy between the sources, an independent committee blindly readjudicated and restored the cause of death according to the information in the CSR narratives.

resultsFor 360/870 deaths (41.4%), the cause of death adjudicated by the FOURIER clinical events committee differed from that declared by the local clinical investigator. When comparing the CSR information with the 2017 primary results publication, we found 11 more deaths from myocardial infarction in the evolocumab group (36 vs 25) and 3 less deaths in the placebo group (27 vs 30, respectively). In the CSR, the number of deaths due to cardiac failure in the evolocumab group was almost double those in the placebo group (31 vs 16). While cardiac and vascular deaths were not assessed as separate outcomes in the original trial analysis, after readjudication, we noted that cardiac deaths were numerically, but non-significantly, higher in the evolocumab group (113) than in the placebo group (88; relative risk (RR) 1.28, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.69, p=0.078), whereas non-cardiac vascular deaths were similar between groups (37 in each; RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.58, p=0.999). The reported HR for cardiovascular mortality in the original trial analysis was 1.05 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.25); after readjudication, we found a greater (although still non-significant) relative increase in cardiovascular mortality in the evolocumab treatment group (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.51, p=0.13).

conclusionAfter readjudication, deaths of cardiac origin were numerically higher in the evolocumab group than in the placebo group in the FOURIER trial, suggesting possible cardiac harm. At the time the trial was terminated early, a non-significantly higher risk of cardiovascular mortality was observed with evolocumab, which was numerically greater in our readjudication. A complete restoration of the FOURIER trial data is required. In the meantime, clinicians should be sceptical about prescribing evolocumab for patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT01764633.

Indexed as

Anticholesteremic AgentsCardiovascular DiseasesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCholesterol, LDLHumansPCSK9 InhibitorsProprotein Convertase 9Risk FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAnticholesteremic AgentsCholesterol, LDLevolocumabPCSK9 InhibitorsPCSK9 protein, humanProprotein Convertase 9adult cardiologycardiologyclinical pharmacologyclinical trialsepidemiologymedical ethics

Identifiers

PMID36585131
PMCPMC9809302
OpenAlexW4313304290

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.