Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36588794›Full record

ArticleChildren & society2022

Mapping review of interventions to reduce the use of restrictive practices in children and young people's institutional settings: The CONTRAST study.

John Baker, Sarah Kendal, Kathryn Berzins, Krysia Canvin, Stella Branthonne-Foster, Tim McDougall, Barry Goldson, Ian Kellar, Judy Wright, Joy Duxbury

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children & society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

John BakerUniversity of Leeds Leeds UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9985-9875
Sarah KendalUniversity of Leeds Leeds UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8557-5716
Kathryn BerzinsUniversity of Leeds Leeds UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5002-5212
Krysia CanvinUniversity of Leeds Leeds UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6571-6411
Stella Branthonne-FosterExpert by Experience.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5545-9199
Tim McDougallLancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust Preston UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9843-9315
Barry GoldsonUniversity of Liverpool Liverpool UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9714-868X
Ian KellarUniversity of Leeds Leeds UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1608-5216
Judy WrightUniversity of Leeds Leeds UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5239-0173
Joy DuxburyManchester Metropolitan University Manchester UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1772-6874

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restrictive practices are often used harmfully with children in institutional settings. Interventions to reduce their use do not appear to have been mapped systematically. Using environmental scanning, we conducted a broad-scope mapping review of English language academic databases, websites and social media, using systematic methods. Included records (

Indexed as

children's perspectivesinstitutional settingsinterventionsrestrictive practicesreview

Identifiers

PMID36588794
PMCPMC9790399

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.