Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36593389›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2023

Unplanned intensive care unit readmission after surgical treatment in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma - forfeiture of surgically achieved advantages?

Felix Lehmann, Anna-Laura Potthoff, Valeri Borger, Muriel Heimann, Stefan Felix Ehrentraut, Christina Schaub, Christian Putensen, Johannes Weller, Christian Bode, Hartmut Vatter and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Felix LehmannDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany. felix.lehmann@ukbonn.de.
Anna-Laura PotthoffDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Valeri BorgerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Muriel HeimannDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Stefan Felix EhrentrautDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Christina SchaubDivision of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Christian PutensenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Johannes WellerDivision of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Christian BodeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Hartmut VatterDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Ulrich HerrlingerDivision of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Patrick SchussDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Niklas Schäfer *Division of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Matthias Schneider *Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
University Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) monitoring is an established option to ensure patient safety after resection of newly diagnosed glioblastoma. In contrast, secondary unplanned ICU readmission following complicating events during the initial postoperative course might be associated with severe morbidity and impair initially intended surgical benefit. In the present study, we assessed the prognostic impact of secondary ICU readmission and aimed to identify preoperatively ascertainable risk factors for the development of such adverse events in patients treated surgically for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Between 2013 and 2018, 240 patients were surgically treated for newly diagnosed glioblastoma at the authors' neuro-oncological center. Secondary ICU readmission was defined as any unplanned admission to the ICU during initial hospital stay. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify preoperatively measurable risk factors for unplanned ICU readmission. Nineteen of 240 glioblastoma patients (8%) were readmitted to the ICU. Median overall survival of patients with unplanned ICU readmission was 9 months compared to 17 months for patients without secondary ICU readmission (p=0.008). Multivariable analysis identified "preoperative administration of dexamethasone > 7 days" (p=0.002) as a significant and independent predictor of secondary unplanned ICU admission. Secondary ICU readmission following surgery for newly diagnosed glioblastoma is significantly associated with poor survival and thus may negate surgically achieved prerequisites for further treatment. This underlines the indispensability of precise patient selection as well as the importance of further scientific debate on these highly relevant aspects for patient safety.

Indexed as

GlioblastomaPatient ReadmissionHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsCritical care, Glioblastoma, Surgery, Dexamethasone

Identifiers

PMID36593389
PMCPMC9807543
OpenAlexW4313426887

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.