Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36595207›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2023

Anti-dementia drugs: a descriptive study of the prescription pattern in Italy.

Ilaria Ippoliti, Antonio Ancidoni, Roberto Da Cas, Andrea Pierantozzi, Nicola Vanacore, Francesco Trotta

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ilaria Ippoliti *National Centre for Drug Research and Evaluation, Italian National Institute of Health, Via Giano Della Bella 34, 00162, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5676-1595
Antonio Ancidoni *National Centre for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Italian National Institute of Health, Via Giano Della Bella 34, 00162, Rome, Italy. antonio.ancidoni@guest.iss.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3949-3127
Roberto Da CasNational Centre for Drug Research and Evaluation, Italian National Institute of Health, Via Giano Della Bella 34, 00162, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3416-6714
Andrea PierantozziHTA & Pharmaceutical Economy Division, Italian Medicines Agency, Via del Tritone, 181, 00187, Rome, Italy.
Nicola VanacoreNational Centre for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Italian National Institute of Health, Via Giano Della Bella 34, 00162, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2817-3758
Francesco TrottaHTA & Pharmaceutical Economy Division, Italian Medicines Agency, Via del Tritone, 181, 00187, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6889-8484
Istituto Superiore di Sanità · ITItalian Medicines Agency · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAcetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) and memantine are currently the only anti-dementia drugs (ADDs) approved for treating Alzheimer's disease (AD) in Italy. This nationwide study aims to characterize dementia drug utilization in a population > 65 years, during 2018-2020.

methodsDifferent administrative healthcare databases were queried to collect both aggregate and individual data.

resultsADD consumption remained stable throughout the study period (~ 9 DDD/1000 inhabitants per day). AChEI consumption was over 5 DDD/1000 inhabitants per day. Memantine consumption was nearly 4 DDD/1000 inhabitants per day, representing 40% of ADD consumption. The prevalence of use of memantine represented nearly half of ADD consumption, substantially unchanged over the 3 years. Comparing the AD prevalence with the prevalence of ADDs use, the gap becomes wider as age increases. In 2019, the proportion of private purchases of ADDs was 38%, mostly represented by donepezil and rivastigmine. In 2020, memantine was the only ADD with an increase in consumption (Δ% 19-20, 1.3%). DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this study represents the first attempt to investigate the ADD prescription pattern in Italy with a Public Health approach. In 2019, the proportion of ADD private purchases point out several issues concerning the reimbursability of ADDs. From a regulatory perspective, ADDs can be reimbursed by the National Health System only to patients diagnosed with AD; therefore, the off-label use of ADDs in patients with mild cognitive impairment may partially explain this phenomenon. The study extends knowledge on the use of ADDs, providing comparisons with studies from other countries that investigate the prescription pattern of ADDs.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCholinesterase InhibitorsAcetylcholinesteraseHumansItalyMemantineAcetylcholinesteraseCholinesterase InhibitorsMemantineAlzheimer’s diseaseAnti-dementia drugsDementiaPharmacoepidemiologyPrescription pattern

Identifiers

PMID36595207
PMCPMC9807981
OpenAlexW4313433220

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.