ArticleInfection & chemotherapy2022
A Korean Post-Marketing Surveillance Study of Dolutegravir Single-Agent Tablets in Patients with HIV-1.
Article in Infection & chemotherapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Story and Implications of the Korean Health Care Facility Counseling Project on People Living with HIV.Infection & chemotherapy · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe integrase strand transfer inhibitor dolutegravir has been indicated in Korea since 2014 for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in combination with other antiretroviral agents. This regulatory post-marketing surveillance (PMS) study evaluated the real-life safety and effectiveness of dolutegravir in patients with HIV-1 in clinical practice in Korea. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis open-label PMS study examined data from consecutive patients (aged ≥12 years) with HIV-1 infection receiving dolutegravir according to locally approved prescribing information; treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients were permitted. Data regarding patient demographics, medical history, clinical characteristics, medications (HIV-related and concomitant), and comorbidities were extracted from patient records over a 1-year treatment period. Outcomes included the safety of dolutegravir (primary endpoint) and real-life effectiveness according to the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) and the proportion of patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA count <50 copies/mL at 48 weeks.
resultsOf 147 patients treated with dolutegravir at 18 centers in Korea (August 2014 - August 2020), 139 were eligible for the safety analyses and 75 for effectiveness analyses. Patients (mean age 47 years) were mostly male (92.8%) and received dolutegravir in combination with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (70.5%) or protease inhibitors (21.6%). Adverse events (AEs) (n = 179 in total) were mostly mild in severity, with the most common being nasopharyngitis (5.0%), dyspepsia (5.0%), pruritus (4.3%), and rash (4.3%). Of 16 adverse drug reactions (ADRs), the most frequent were rash, diarrhea, headache, insomnia, and somnolence (1.4% each). Of 2 serious ADRs, only 1 (gastroenteritis) was unexpected, and both resolved. The risk of experiencing an AE while receiving dolutegravir appeared to be especially increased in patients receiving concomitant medications for other conditions. Dolutegravir effectively suppressed HIV-1 (93.3% of patients had plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL), and 100% of patients showed symptom improvement based on physician global assessment.
conclusionResults of this PMS study showed that dolutegravir administered as highly active antiretroviral therapy was well tolerated and effective in patients with HIV-1 infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.