ReviewOpen heart2022
Coronary endothelial dysfunction: from pathogenesis to clinical implications.
Review in Open heart, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Serum Galectin-3 Levels Correlate with Reduced Vascular Reactivity in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Pannexins in the heart: cell-specific expression and contributions to disease.Cell and tissue research · 2026Review
- Relationship between epicardial fat tissue, endothelial function, and coronary flow reserve in coronary microvascular disease patients.Cardiovascular ultrasound · 2026Article
- Nitric Oxide Signaling in Cardiovascular Physiology and Pathology: Mechanisms, Dysregulation, and Therapeutic Frontiers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The role of ferroptosis in vascular endothelial cells and its role in the pathogenesis of cervical spondylosis of vertebral artery type: a comprehensive review.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas · 2026Review
- Association between NT-pro-BNP levels and endothelial dysfunction assessed by digital thermal monitoring in patients with coronary artery disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Sex differences in macro- and microvascular reactivity - a systematic review and meta-analysis.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025Review
- Effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on ion channels in heart failure: focus on the endothelium.Basic research in cardiology · 2025Review
- Overexpression of ABCA1 in Carotid Endothelium of Hyperlipidemic Rabbits Modulates Vascular Inflammation.Human gene therapy · 2025Article
- Elastic, load-bearing and autoclavable protein-based graft for coronary revascularization.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Eicosapentaenoic and Docosahexaenoic Acid Supplementation Increases HDL Content in n-3 Fatty Acids and Improves Endothelial Function in Hypertriglyceridemic Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Endothelial dysfunction (ED) has a substantial role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and other vascular diseases. Multiple risk factors, including smoking, hyperlipiadaemia and diabetes, can have associated ED, which is correlated with cardiac events. Measurement of coronary artery endothelial function requires the use of invasive techniques to assess both epicardial coronary artery and microvascular beds. Peripheral vascular techniques and endothelial biomarkers can be used to indirectly assess coronary ED. In this review of coronary artery ED, we discuss the current state of the field, the techniques used to measure ED and its clinical implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.