ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2023
Leveraging drug perturbation to reveal genetic regulators of hepatic gene expression in African Americans.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Expanded chromatin accessibility mapping explains genetic variation associated with complex traits in liver.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- Dynamic neuro-immune regulation of psychiatric risk loci in human neurons.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Addressing missing context in regulatory variation across primate evolution.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2025Review
- Single-cell eQTL analysis identifies genetic variation underlying metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis.Nature genetics · 2025Article
- Disease-associated loci share properties with response eQTLs under common environmental exposures.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Expression quantitative locus (eQTL) studies have paved the way in identifying genetic variation impacting gene expression levels. African Americans (AAs) are disproportionately underrepresented in eQTL studies, resulting in a lack of power to identify population-specific regulatory variants especially related to drug response. Specific drugs are known to affect the biosynthesis of drug metabolism enzymes as well as other genes. We used drug perturbation in cultured primary hepatocytes derived from AAs to determine the effect of drug treatment on eQTL mapping and to identify the drug response eQTLs (reQTLs) that show altered effect size following drug treatment. Whole-genome genotyping (Illumina MEGA array) and RNA sequencing were performed on 60 primary hepatocyte cultures after treatment with six drugs (Rifampin, Phenytoin, Carbamazepine, Dexamethasone, Phenobarbital, and Omeprazole) and at baseline (no treatment). eQTLs were mapped by treatment and jointly with Meta-Tissue. We found varying transcriptional changes across different drug treatments and identified Nrf2 as a potential general transcriptional regulator. We jointly mapped eQTLs with gene expression data across all drug treatments and baseline, which increased our power to detect eQTLs by 2.7-fold. We also identified 2,988 reQTLs (eQTLs with altered effect size after drug treatment). reQTLs were more likely to overlap transcription factor binding sites, and we uncovered reQTLs for drug metabolizing genes such as CYP3A5. Our results provide insights into the genetic regulation of gene expression in hepatocytes through drug perturbation and provide insight into SNPs that effect the liver's ability to respond to transcription upregulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.