Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36611338›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Update on Corneal Confocal Microscopy Imaging.

Pilar Cañadas, Marta Alberquilla García-Velasco, José Luis Hernández Verdejo, Miguel A Teus

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. An explainable unsupervised learning approach for anomaly detection on cornealFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Diagnosis ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pilar CañadasOptometry and Vision Department, School of Optometry, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3741-8318
Marta Alberquilla García-VelascoOptometry and Vision Department, School of Optometry, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
José Luis Hernández VerdejoOptometry and Vision Department, School of Optometry, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6418-4086
Miguel A TeusUniversitary Hospital "Príncipe de Asturias", 28805 Alcalá de Henares, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3835-9882
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversidad de Alcalá · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vivo corneal confocal microscopy (IVCM) is a non-invasive ophthalmic imaging technique that provides images of the cornea at the cellular level. Despite the uses in ocular surface pathologies, in the last decades IVCM has been used to provide more knowledge in refractive surgery wound healing, in neuropathies diagnosis, etc. The observation of the corneal cells, both normal and inflammatory, and the possibility of quantification of the corneal nerve density with manual or automated tools, makes IVCM have a significant potential to improve the diagnosis and prognosis in several systemic and corneal conditions.

Indexed as

corneal confocal microscopycorneal pathologydry eye diseasein vivo imagesneuropathy

Identifiers

PMID36611338
PMCPMC9818591
OpenAlexW4313413676

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.